A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia

Constantine T. Frantzides, Atul K. Madan, Mark Alan Carlson, George P. Stavropoulos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

308 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Large hiatal hernias are prone to disruption, resulting in reherniation, when repaired with simple cruroplasty. The use of mesh may decrease the rate of reherniation in the laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated private hospital. Patients: Seventy-two individuals undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a hernia defect greater or equal to 8 cm in diameter. Intervention: Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty (n=36) vs Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty and onlay of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh (n=36). Main Outcome Measures: Recurrences, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and cost. Results: Patients in both groups had similar hospital stays, but the PTFE group had a longer operative time. The cost of the repair was $960 ± $70 more in the group with the prosthesis. Complications were minor and similar in both groups. There were 8 hernia recurrences (22%) in the primary repair group and none in the PTFE group (P<.006). Conclusion: The use of prosthetic reinforcement of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias may prevent hernia recurrences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)649-652
Number of pages4
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume137
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Fundoplication
Hiatal Hernia
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Hernia
Operative Time
Recurrence
Length of Stay
Costs and Cost Analysis
Inlays
Private Hospitals
Prostheses and Implants
Randomized Controlled Trials
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. / Frantzides, Constantine T.; Madan, Atul K.; Carlson, Mark Alan; Stavropoulos, George P.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 137, No. 6, 01.01.2002, p. 649-652.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a75fe6c8544b486b92781715e3468233,
title = "A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Large hiatal hernias are prone to disruption, resulting in reherniation, when repaired with simple cruroplasty. The use of mesh may decrease the rate of reherniation in the laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated private hospital. Patients: Seventy-two individuals undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a hernia defect greater or equal to 8 cm in diameter. Intervention: Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty (n=36) vs Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty and onlay of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh (n=36). Main Outcome Measures: Recurrences, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and cost. Results: Patients in both groups had similar hospital stays, but the PTFE group had a longer operative time. The cost of the repair was $960 ± $70 more in the group with the prosthesis. Complications were minor and similar in both groups. There were 8 hernia recurrences (22{\%}) in the primary repair group and none in the PTFE group (P<.006). Conclusion: The use of prosthetic reinforcement of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias may prevent hernia recurrences.",
author = "Frantzides, {Constantine T.} and Madan, {Atul K.} and Carlson, {Mark Alan} and Stavropoulos, {George P.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.137.6.649",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "649--652",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia

AU - Frantzides, Constantine T.

AU - Madan, Atul K.

AU - Carlson, Mark Alan

AU - Stavropoulos, George P.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Hypothesis: Large hiatal hernias are prone to disruption, resulting in reherniation, when repaired with simple cruroplasty. The use of mesh may decrease the rate of reherniation in the laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated private hospital. Patients: Seventy-two individuals undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a hernia defect greater or equal to 8 cm in diameter. Intervention: Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty (n=36) vs Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty and onlay of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh (n=36). Main Outcome Measures: Recurrences, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and cost. Results: Patients in both groups had similar hospital stays, but the PTFE group had a longer operative time. The cost of the repair was $960 ± $70 more in the group with the prosthesis. Complications were minor and similar in both groups. There were 8 hernia recurrences (22%) in the primary repair group and none in the PTFE group (P<.006). Conclusion: The use of prosthetic reinforcement of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias may prevent hernia recurrences.

AB - Hypothesis: Large hiatal hernias are prone to disruption, resulting in reherniation, when repaired with simple cruroplasty. The use of mesh may decrease the rate of reherniation in the laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias. Design: Prospective, randomized controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated private hospital. Patients: Seventy-two individuals undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a hernia defect greater or equal to 8 cm in diameter. Intervention: Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty (n=36) vs Nissen fundoplication with posterior cruroplasty and onlay of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh (n=36). Main Outcome Measures: Recurrences, complications, hospital stay, operative time, and cost. Results: Patients in both groups had similar hospital stays, but the PTFE group had a longer operative time. The cost of the repair was $960 ± $70 more in the group with the prosthesis. Complications were minor and similar in both groups. There were 8 hernia recurrences (22%) in the primary repair group and none in the PTFE group (P<.006). Conclusion: The use of prosthetic reinforcement of cruroplasty in large hiatal hernias may prevent hernia recurrences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036270302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036270302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.649

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.137.6.649

M3 - Article

C2 - 12049534

AN - SCOPUS:0036270302

VL - 137

SP - 649

EP - 652

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 6

ER -