A prospective evaluation of standard versus battery-powered sequential compression devices in postsurgical patients

Andrea T. Obi, Rafael Alvarez, Bradley N. Reames, Marc J. Moote, Maureen A. Thompson, Thomas W. Wakefield, Peter K. Henke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Sequential compression devices (SCDs) reduce deep venous thrombosis in postsurgical patients, but the use is hindered by poor compliance. Methods General and orthopedic surgery patients (n = 67) were randomized to standard- or battery-powered SCDs. Compliance was documented hourly. Nurses and patients were issued a survey to assess barriers to compliance and device satisfaction. Results Compliance with standard SCDs was 47% compared with 85% with battery-powered SCDs (P <.001). The most common barriers identified by nurses and patients were ambulation and transfers, which were mitigated with the battery-powered device. A majority (79%) of those issued a battery-powered device reported no major problems compared with only 14% of patients issued a standard device (P <.005). Conclusions The dual venous thromboembolism prevention strategies of early mobilization and SCD utilization can be met with the appropriate equipment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-681
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican journal of surgery
Volume209
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Compliance
Nurses
Early Ambulation
Venous Thromboembolism
Venous Thrombosis
Walking
Orthopedics

Keywords

  • Compression devices
  • Deep venous thrombosis
  • Prophylaxis
  • Quality improvement
  • Venous thromboembolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

A prospective evaluation of standard versus battery-powered sequential compression devices in postsurgical patients. / Obi, Andrea T.; Alvarez, Rafael; Reames, Bradley N.; Moote, Marc J.; Thompson, Maureen A.; Wakefield, Thomas W.; Henke, Peter K.

In: American journal of surgery, Vol. 209, No. 4, 01.04.2015, p. 675-681.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Obi, Andrea T. ; Alvarez, Rafael ; Reames, Bradley N. ; Moote, Marc J. ; Thompson, Maureen A. ; Wakefield, Thomas W. ; Henke, Peter K. / A prospective evaluation of standard versus battery-powered sequential compression devices in postsurgical patients. In: American journal of surgery. 2015 ; Vol. 209, No. 4. pp. 675-681.
@article{9340317778a14d5082de5cb061699984,
title = "A prospective evaluation of standard versus battery-powered sequential compression devices in postsurgical patients",
abstract = "Background Sequential compression devices (SCDs) reduce deep venous thrombosis in postsurgical patients, but the use is hindered by poor compliance. Methods General and orthopedic surgery patients (n = 67) were randomized to standard- or battery-powered SCDs. Compliance was documented hourly. Nurses and patients were issued a survey to assess barriers to compliance and device satisfaction. Results Compliance with standard SCDs was 47{\%} compared with 85{\%} with battery-powered SCDs (P <.001). The most common barriers identified by nurses and patients were ambulation and transfers, which were mitigated with the battery-powered device. A majority (79{\%}) of those issued a battery-powered device reported no major problems compared with only 14{\%} of patients issued a standard device (P <.005). Conclusions The dual venous thromboembolism prevention strategies of early mobilization and SCD utilization can be met with the appropriate equipment.",
keywords = "Compression devices, Deep venous thrombosis, Prophylaxis, Quality improvement, Venous thromboembolism",
author = "Obi, {Andrea T.} and Rafael Alvarez and Reames, {Bradley N.} and Moote, {Marc J.} and Thompson, {Maureen A.} and Wakefield, {Thomas W.} and Henke, {Peter K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "209",
pages = "675--681",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A prospective evaluation of standard versus battery-powered sequential compression devices in postsurgical patients

AU - Obi, Andrea T.

AU - Alvarez, Rafael

AU - Reames, Bradley N.

AU - Moote, Marc J.

AU - Thompson, Maureen A.

AU - Wakefield, Thomas W.

AU - Henke, Peter K.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - Background Sequential compression devices (SCDs) reduce deep venous thrombosis in postsurgical patients, but the use is hindered by poor compliance. Methods General and orthopedic surgery patients (n = 67) were randomized to standard- or battery-powered SCDs. Compliance was documented hourly. Nurses and patients were issued a survey to assess barriers to compliance and device satisfaction. Results Compliance with standard SCDs was 47% compared with 85% with battery-powered SCDs (P <.001). The most common barriers identified by nurses and patients were ambulation and transfers, which were mitigated with the battery-powered device. A majority (79%) of those issued a battery-powered device reported no major problems compared with only 14% of patients issued a standard device (P <.005). Conclusions The dual venous thromboembolism prevention strategies of early mobilization and SCD utilization can be met with the appropriate equipment.

AB - Background Sequential compression devices (SCDs) reduce deep venous thrombosis in postsurgical patients, but the use is hindered by poor compliance. Methods General and orthopedic surgery patients (n = 67) were randomized to standard- or battery-powered SCDs. Compliance was documented hourly. Nurses and patients were issued a survey to assess barriers to compliance and device satisfaction. Results Compliance with standard SCDs was 47% compared with 85% with battery-powered SCDs (P <.001). The most common barriers identified by nurses and patients were ambulation and transfers, which were mitigated with the battery-powered device. A majority (79%) of those issued a battery-powered device reported no major problems compared with only 14% of patients issued a standard device (P <.005). Conclusions The dual venous thromboembolism prevention strategies of early mobilization and SCD utilization can be met with the appropriate equipment.

KW - Compression devices

KW - Deep venous thrombosis

KW - Prophylaxis

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Venous thromboembolism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925273885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925273885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.017

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2014.06.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 25812845

AN - SCOPUS:84925273885

VL - 209

SP - 675

EP - 681

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 4

ER -