A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures

Single-column plating

Gregory M. Meloy, Matthew A Mormino, Peter A. Siska, Ivan S. Tarkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The study aimed (1) to examine if there are equivalent results in terms of union, alignment and elbow functionally comparing single- to dual-column plating of AO/OTA 13A2 and A3 distal humeral fractures and (2) if there are more implant-related complications in patients managed with bicolumnar plating compared to single-column plate fixation. Design: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study. Setting: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres. Patients/participants: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3). Intervention: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment. Main outcome measurements: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared. Results: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications. Conclusions: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1620-1624
Number of pages5
JournalInjury
Volume44
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2013

Fingerprint

Humeral Fractures
Joints
Elbow
Orthopedics
Articular Range of Motion
Wounds and Injuries
Ulnar Neuropathies
Radial Nerve
Ulnar Nerve
Trauma Centers
Paralysis
Retrospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Distal humeral fracture
  • Dual-column plating
  • Extra-articular
  • Single-column plating

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures : Single-column plating. / Meloy, Gregory M.; Mormino, Matthew A; Siska, Peter A.; Tarkin, Ivan S.

In: Injury, Vol. 44, No. 11, 01.11.2013, p. 1620-1624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Meloy, Gregory M. ; Mormino, Matthew A ; Siska, Peter A. ; Tarkin, Ivan S. / A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures : Single-column plating. In: Injury. 2013 ; Vol. 44, No. 11. pp. 1620-1624.
@article{a5eee73bc4504465a5ed81d2767ed26b,
title = "A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures: Single-column plating",
abstract = "Objectives: The study aimed (1) to examine if there are equivalent results in terms of union, alignment and elbow functionally comparing single- to dual-column plating of AO/OTA 13A2 and A3 distal humeral fractures and (2) if there are more implant-related complications in patients managed with bicolumnar plating compared to single-column plate fixation. Design: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study. Setting: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres. Patients/participants: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft f{\"u}r Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3). Intervention: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment. Main outcome measurements: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared. Results: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications. Conclusions: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.",
keywords = "Distal humeral fracture, Dual-column plating, Extra-articular, Single-column plating",
author = "Meloy, {Gregory M.} and Mormino, {Matthew A} and Siska, {Peter A.} and Tarkin, {Ivan S.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "1620--1624",
journal = "Injury",
issn = "0020-1383",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A paradigm shift in the surgical reconstruction of extra-articular distal humeral fractures

T2 - Single-column plating

AU - Meloy, Gregory M.

AU - Mormino, Matthew A

AU - Siska, Peter A.

AU - Tarkin, Ivan S.

PY - 2013/11/1

Y1 - 2013/11/1

N2 - Objectives: The study aimed (1) to examine if there are equivalent results in terms of union, alignment and elbow functionally comparing single- to dual-column plating of AO/OTA 13A2 and A3 distal humeral fractures and (2) if there are more implant-related complications in patients managed with bicolumnar plating compared to single-column plate fixation. Design: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study. Setting: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres. Patients/participants: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3). Intervention: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment. Main outcome measurements: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared. Results: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications. Conclusions: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.

AB - Objectives: The study aimed (1) to examine if there are equivalent results in terms of union, alignment and elbow functionally comparing single- to dual-column plating of AO/OTA 13A2 and A3 distal humeral fractures and (2) if there are more implant-related complications in patients managed with bicolumnar plating compared to single-column plate fixation. Design: This was a multi-centred retrospective comparative study. Setting: The study was conducted at two academic level 1 trauma centres. Patients/participants: A total of 105 patients were identified to have surgical management of extra-articular distal humeral fractures Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) 13A2 and AO/OTA 13A3). Intervention: Patients were treated with traditional dual-column plating or a single-column posterolateral small-fragment pre-contoured locking plate used as a neutralisation device with at least five screws in the short distal segment. Main outcome measurements: The patients' elbow functionality was assessed in terms of range of motion, union and alignment. In addition, the rate of complications between the groups including radial nerve palsy, implant-related complications (painful prominence and/or ulnar nerve neuritis) and elbow stiffness were compared. Results: Patients treated with single-column plating had similar union rates and alignment. However, single-column plating resulted in a significantly better range of motion with less complications. Conclusions: The current study suggests that exposure/instrumentation of only the lateral column is a reliable and preferred technique. This technique allows for comparable union rates and alignment with increased elbow functionality and decreased number of complications.

KW - Distal humeral fracture

KW - Dual-column plating

KW - Extra-articular

KW - Single-column plating

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885295845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885295845&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.005

DO - 10.1016/j.injury.2013.07.005

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 1620

EP - 1624

JO - Injury

JF - Injury

SN - 0020-1383

IS - 11

ER -