A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations

Madhavi Jayanthi, Michael H Epstein, Edward A. Polloway, William D. Bursuck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to survey the perceptions of general education teachers nationwide, particularly as they relate to making testing adaptations for students with disabilities. A survey was sent to 708 general education teachers nationwide. The return rate was 56.6% (N= 401). The specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most helpful for students with disabilities were (a) giving individual help with directions during tests, (b) reading test questions to students, and (c) simplifying wording of test questions. Similarly, the specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most easy to make were (a) using black-and-white copies, (b) providing extra space on tests for answering, (c) giving practice questions as a study guide, (d) giving open-book/notes tests, and (e) giving individual help with directions during tests. In addition, a total of 247 (66.6%) general education teachers indicated that it was not fair to make testing adaptations only for students with disabilities, whereas 124 (33.4%) respondents indicated that it was fair. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-115
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

general education
Students
Education
teacher
disability
student
Reading
Surveys and Questionnaires
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations. / Jayanthi, Madhavi; Epstein, Michael H; Polloway, Edward A.; Bursuck, William D.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 99-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jayanthi, Madhavi ; Epstein, Michael H ; Polloway, Edward A. ; Bursuck, William D. / A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations. In: Journal of Special Education. 1996 ; Vol. 30, No. 1. pp. 99-115.
@article{ce30b1fdf68c4e14ae0b5f7f80245d48,
title = "A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to survey the perceptions of general education teachers nationwide, particularly as they relate to making testing adaptations for students with disabilities. A survey was sent to 708 general education teachers nationwide. The return rate was 56.6{\%} (N= 401). The specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most helpful for students with disabilities were (a) giving individual help with directions during tests, (b) reading test questions to students, and (c) simplifying wording of test questions. Similarly, the specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most easy to make were (a) using black-and-white copies, (b) providing extra space on tests for answering, (c) giving practice questions as a study guide, (d) giving open-book/notes tests, and (e) giving individual help with directions during tests. In addition, a total of 247 (66.6{\%}) general education teachers indicated that it was not fair to make testing adaptations only for students with disabilities, whereas 124 (33.4{\%}) respondents indicated that it was fair. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.",
author = "Madhavi Jayanthi and Epstein, {Michael H} and Polloway, {Edward A.} and Bursuck, {William D.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002246699603000106",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "99--115",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A national survey of general education teachers' perceptions of testing adaptations

AU - Jayanthi, Madhavi

AU - Epstein, Michael H

AU - Polloway, Edward A.

AU - Bursuck, William D.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to survey the perceptions of general education teachers nationwide, particularly as they relate to making testing adaptations for students with disabilities. A survey was sent to 708 general education teachers nationwide. The return rate was 56.6% (N= 401). The specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most helpful for students with disabilities were (a) giving individual help with directions during tests, (b) reading test questions to students, and (c) simplifying wording of test questions. Similarly, the specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most easy to make were (a) using black-and-white copies, (b) providing extra space on tests for answering, (c) giving practice questions as a study guide, (d) giving open-book/notes tests, and (e) giving individual help with directions during tests. In addition, a total of 247 (66.6%) general education teachers indicated that it was not fair to make testing adaptations only for students with disabilities, whereas 124 (33.4%) respondents indicated that it was fair. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this study was to survey the perceptions of general education teachers nationwide, particularly as they relate to making testing adaptations for students with disabilities. A survey was sent to 708 general education teachers nationwide. The return rate was 56.6% (N= 401). The specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most helpful for students with disabilities were (a) giving individual help with directions during tests, (b) reading test questions to students, and (c) simplifying wording of test questions. Similarly, the specific testing adaptations that were rated as being most easy to make were (a) using black-and-white copies, (b) providing extra space on tests for answering, (c) giving practice questions as a study guide, (d) giving open-book/notes tests, and (e) giving individual help with directions during tests. In addition, a total of 247 (66.6%) general education teachers indicated that it was not fair to make testing adaptations only for students with disabilities, whereas 124 (33.4%) respondents indicated that it was fair. Other results of the study, limitations of the study, and future research needs are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030304137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030304137&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246699603000106

DO - 10.1177/002246699603000106

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 99

EP - 115

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 1

ER -