A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals

Sanjay Saint, Christine P. Kowalski, Jane Forman, Laura Damschroder, Timothy P. Hofer, Samuel R. Kaufman, John W Creswell, Sarah L. Krein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection, there is little information about why hospitals use or do not use a range of available preventive practices. We thus conducted a multicenter study to understand better how US hospitals approach the prevention of hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS. This research is part of a larger study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative phase consisted of 38 semistructured phone interviews with key personnel at 14 purposefully sampled US hospitals and 39 in-person interviews at 5 of those 14 hospitals, to identify recurrent and unifying themes that characterize how hospitals have addressed hospital-acquired UTI. RESULTS. Four recurrent themes emerged from our study data. First, although preventing hospital-acquired UTI was a low priority for most hospitals, there was substantial recognition of the value of early removal of a urinary catheter for patients. Second, those hospitals that made UTI prevention a high priority also focused on noninfectious complications and had committed advocates, or "champions," who facilitated prevention activities. Third, hospital-specific pilot studies were important in deciding whether or not to use devices such as antimicrobial- impregnated catheters. Finally, external forces, such as public reporting, influenced UTI surveillance and infection prevention activities. CONCLUSIONS. Clinicians and policy makers can use our findings to develop initiatives that, for example, use a champion to promote the removal of unnecessary urinary catheters or exploit external forces, such public reporting, to enhance patient safety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-341
Number of pages9
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract Infections
Multicenter Studies
Urinary Catheters
Interviews
Patient Safety
Cross Infection
Administrative Personnel
Catheters
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Cite this

Saint, S., Kowalski, C. P., Forman, J., Damschroder, L., Hofer, T. P., Kaufman, S. R., ... Krein, S. L. (2008). A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, 29(4), 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1086/529589

A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals. / Saint, Sanjay; Kowalski, Christine P.; Forman, Jane; Damschroder, Laura; Hofer, Timothy P.; Kaufman, Samuel R.; Creswell, John W; Krein, Sarah L.

In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.04.2008, p. 333-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saint, S, Kowalski, CP, Forman, J, Damschroder, L, Hofer, TP, Kaufman, SR, Creswell, JW & Krein, SL 2008, 'A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals', Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1086/529589
Saint, Sanjay ; Kowalski, Christine P. ; Forman, Jane ; Damschroder, Laura ; Hofer, Timothy P. ; Kaufman, Samuel R. ; Creswell, John W ; Krein, Sarah L. / A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals. In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2008 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 333-341.
@article{20e65101dd1e47dfa553f90b657a2125,
title = "A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE. Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection, there is little information about why hospitals use or do not use a range of available preventive practices. We thus conducted a multicenter study to understand better how US hospitals approach the prevention of hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS. This research is part of a larger study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative phase consisted of 38 semistructured phone interviews with key personnel at 14 purposefully sampled US hospitals and 39 in-person interviews at 5 of those 14 hospitals, to identify recurrent and unifying themes that characterize how hospitals have addressed hospital-acquired UTI. RESULTS. Four recurrent themes emerged from our study data. First, although preventing hospital-acquired UTI was a low priority for most hospitals, there was substantial recognition of the value of early removal of a urinary catheter for patients. Second, those hospitals that made UTI prevention a high priority also focused on noninfectious complications and had committed advocates, or {"}champions,{"} who facilitated prevention activities. Third, hospital-specific pilot studies were important in deciding whether or not to use devices such as antimicrobial- impregnated catheters. Finally, external forces, such as public reporting, influenced UTI surveillance and infection prevention activities. CONCLUSIONS. Clinicians and policy makers can use our findings to develop initiatives that, for example, use a champion to promote the removal of unnecessary urinary catheters or exploit external forces, such public reporting, to enhance patient safety.",
author = "Sanjay Saint and Kowalski, {Christine P.} and Jane Forman and Laura Damschroder and Hofer, {Timothy P.} and Kaufman, {Samuel R.} and Creswell, {John W} and Krein, {Sarah L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1086/529589",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "333--341",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multicenter qualitative study on preventing hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in US hospitals

AU - Saint, Sanjay

AU - Kowalski, Christine P.

AU - Forman, Jane

AU - Damschroder, Laura

AU - Hofer, Timothy P.

AU - Kaufman, Samuel R.

AU - Creswell, John W

AU - Krein, Sarah L.

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE. Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection, there is little information about why hospitals use or do not use a range of available preventive practices. We thus conducted a multicenter study to understand better how US hospitals approach the prevention of hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS. This research is part of a larger study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative phase consisted of 38 semistructured phone interviews with key personnel at 14 purposefully sampled US hospitals and 39 in-person interviews at 5 of those 14 hospitals, to identify recurrent and unifying themes that characterize how hospitals have addressed hospital-acquired UTI. RESULTS. Four recurrent themes emerged from our study data. First, although preventing hospital-acquired UTI was a low priority for most hospitals, there was substantial recognition of the value of early removal of a urinary catheter for patients. Second, those hospitals that made UTI prevention a high priority also focused on noninfectious complications and had committed advocates, or "champions," who facilitated prevention activities. Third, hospital-specific pilot studies were important in deciding whether or not to use devices such as antimicrobial- impregnated catheters. Finally, external forces, such as public reporting, influenced UTI surveillance and infection prevention activities. CONCLUSIONS. Clinicians and policy makers can use our findings to develop initiatives that, for example, use a champion to promote the removal of unnecessary urinary catheters or exploit external forces, such public reporting, to enhance patient safety.

AB - OBJECTIVE. Although urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common hospital-acquired infection, there is little information about why hospitals use or do not use a range of available preventive practices. We thus conducted a multicenter study to understand better how US hospitals approach the prevention of hospital-acquired UTI. METHODS. This research is part of a larger study employing both quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative phase consisted of 38 semistructured phone interviews with key personnel at 14 purposefully sampled US hospitals and 39 in-person interviews at 5 of those 14 hospitals, to identify recurrent and unifying themes that characterize how hospitals have addressed hospital-acquired UTI. RESULTS. Four recurrent themes emerged from our study data. First, although preventing hospital-acquired UTI was a low priority for most hospitals, there was substantial recognition of the value of early removal of a urinary catheter for patients. Second, those hospitals that made UTI prevention a high priority also focused on noninfectious complications and had committed advocates, or "champions," who facilitated prevention activities. Third, hospital-specific pilot studies were important in deciding whether or not to use devices such as antimicrobial- impregnated catheters. Finally, external forces, such as public reporting, influenced UTI surveillance and infection prevention activities. CONCLUSIONS. Clinicians and policy makers can use our findings to develop initiatives that, for example, use a champion to promote the removal of unnecessary urinary catheters or exploit external forces, such public reporting, to enhance patient safety.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40949149574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40949149574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/529589

DO - 10.1086/529589

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 333

EP - 341

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

IS - 4

ER -