A model for nurse practitioner regulation: principles underpinning a three-registration category approach.

J. Wearing, Joyce Black, Karen Kline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)40-49
Number of pages10
JournalNursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jan 2010

Fingerprint

Advanced Practice Nursing
Nurse Practitioners
Family Nurse Practitioners
Education
British Columbia
Administrative Personnel
Health Personnel
Canada
Decision Making
Nursing
Referral and Consultation
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

A model for nurse practitioner regulation : principles underpinning a three-registration category approach. / Wearing, J.; Black, Joyce; Kline, Karen.

In: Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.), Vol. 22, No. 4, 01.2010, p. 40-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b680809d5bb741618fe8231c8adbdb33,
title = "A model for nurse practitioner regulation: principles underpinning a three-registration category approach.",
abstract = "The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.",
author = "J. Wearing and Joyce Black and Karen Kline",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "40--49",
journal = "Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)",
issn = "1910-622X",
publisher = "Longwoods Publishing Corp.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A model for nurse practitioner regulation

T2 - principles underpinning a three-registration category approach.

AU - Wearing, J.

AU - Black, Joyce

AU - Kline, Karen

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.

AB - The issue of professional regulation of advanced nursing practice is one of the most controversial in the area of nursing regulation today. The controversy affects the roles and scope of advanced practice as well as education requirements. Nurse practitioner (NP) practice is one kind of advanced nursing practice receiving attention currently, with a view to developing consistent educational and regulatory approaches. Consistency is needed to enhance the mobility and flexibility of these important healthcare provider resources in time of shortages. This paper describes how the regulatory body in British Columbia decided to register only three categories of NP: family/all ages, adult and pediatrics. It describes the state of NP regulation when the work began, the consultation process used in coming to this decision and the principles underlying the decision. Regulators, educators and administrators may benefit from understanding the issues and reasoning presented. Literature to guide this work was lacking, a gap this paper addresses to help inform decision-making in other settings and contexts. Dialogue about this approach may facilitate movement towards consistent approaches to the regulation, education and deployment of NPs in Canada and elsewhere.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952114894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952114894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 20160523

AN - SCOPUS:79952114894

VL - 22

SP - 40

EP - 49

JO - Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)

JF - Nursing leadership (Toronto, Ont.)

SN - 1910-622X

IS - 4

ER -