A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance

John Wooldredge, Benjamin Steiner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A macro-level perspective for understanding differences in levels of inmate assaults and nonviolent offenses across US prisons is presented which emphasizes the greater relevance of population composition as opposed to environmental and managerial controls over inmates. We argue that population effects are more relevant due to a heavy reliance on custodial risk assessments which place high concentrations of the most dangerous offenders within particular facilities or units within facilities, rendering these environments less effective for controlling inmate misconduct regardless of tighter security and greater use of administrative controls relative to lower security environments. A partial test of our model was conducted with a national US sample of 247 state prisons for men and women. Results indicate that while both facility and population factors are relevant predictors of offense levels, population effects are stronger and more prevalent. The implications of specific findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)230-257
Number of pages28
JournalPunishment and Society
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 28 2015

Fingerprint

deviant behavior
macro level
correctional institution
offense
demographic situation
assault
risk assessment
offender

Keywords

  • inmate assaults
  • prison environment; prison inmates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Law

Cite this

A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance. / Wooldredge, John; Steiner, Benjamin.

In: Punishment and Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, 28.04.2015, p. 230-257.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wooldredge, John ; Steiner, Benjamin. / A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance. In: Punishment and Society. 2015 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 230-257.
@article{a7e0ebd56ecc489fa6de0be8132443b0,
title = "A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance",
abstract = "A macro-level perspective for understanding differences in levels of inmate assaults and nonviolent offenses across US prisons is presented which emphasizes the greater relevance of population composition as opposed to environmental and managerial controls over inmates. We argue that population effects are more relevant due to a heavy reliance on custodial risk assessments which place high concentrations of the most dangerous offenders within particular facilities or units within facilities, rendering these environments less effective for controlling inmate misconduct regardless of tighter security and greater use of administrative controls relative to lower security environments. A partial test of our model was conducted with a national US sample of 247 state prisons for men and women. Results indicate that while both facility and population factors are relevant predictors of offense levels, population effects are stronger and more prevalent. The implications of specific findings are discussed.",
keywords = "inmate assaults, prison environment; prison inmates",
author = "John Wooldredge and Benjamin Steiner",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "28",
doi = "10.1177/1462474515577151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "230--257",
journal = "Punishment and Society",
issn = "1462-4745",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A macro-level perspective on prison inmate deviance

AU - Wooldredge, John

AU - Steiner, Benjamin

PY - 2015/4/28

Y1 - 2015/4/28

N2 - A macro-level perspective for understanding differences in levels of inmate assaults and nonviolent offenses across US prisons is presented which emphasizes the greater relevance of population composition as opposed to environmental and managerial controls over inmates. We argue that population effects are more relevant due to a heavy reliance on custodial risk assessments which place high concentrations of the most dangerous offenders within particular facilities or units within facilities, rendering these environments less effective for controlling inmate misconduct regardless of tighter security and greater use of administrative controls relative to lower security environments. A partial test of our model was conducted with a national US sample of 247 state prisons for men and women. Results indicate that while both facility and population factors are relevant predictors of offense levels, population effects are stronger and more prevalent. The implications of specific findings are discussed.

AB - A macro-level perspective for understanding differences in levels of inmate assaults and nonviolent offenses across US prisons is presented which emphasizes the greater relevance of population composition as opposed to environmental and managerial controls over inmates. We argue that population effects are more relevant due to a heavy reliance on custodial risk assessments which place high concentrations of the most dangerous offenders within particular facilities or units within facilities, rendering these environments less effective for controlling inmate misconduct regardless of tighter security and greater use of administrative controls relative to lower security environments. A partial test of our model was conducted with a national US sample of 247 state prisons for men and women. Results indicate that while both facility and population factors are relevant predictors of offense levels, population effects are stronger and more prevalent. The implications of specific findings are discussed.

KW - inmate assaults

KW - prison environment; prison inmates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928562677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928562677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1462474515577151

DO - 10.1177/1462474515577151

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84928562677

VL - 17

SP - 230

EP - 257

JO - Punishment and Society

JF - Punishment and Society

SN - 1462-4745

IS - 2

ER -