A ground-based comparison of the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) and a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer

Kirk L. English, Kyle J. Hackney, John K. De Witt, Robert J. Ploutz-Snyder, Elizabeth L. Goetchius, Lori L. Ploutz-Snyder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers perform muscle strength and endurance testing pre- and postflight to assess the physiologic adaptations associated with long-duration exposure to microgravity. However, a reliable and standardized method to document strength changes in-flight has not been established. To address this issue, a proprietary dynamometer, the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) has been developed and flown aboard the ISS. The aims of this ground-based investigation were to: (1) evaluate the test-retest reliability of MARES and (2) determine its agreement with a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer previously used for pre- and postflight medical testing. Methods: Six males (179.5 ± 4.7 cm; 82.0 ± 8.7 kg; 31.3 ± 4.0 yr) and four females (163.2 ± 7.3 cm; 63.2 ± 1.9 kg; 32.3 ± 6.8 yr) completed two testing sessions on a HUMAC NORM isokinetic dynamometer (NORM) and two sessions on MARES using a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over design. Peak torque values at 60° and 180° s-1 were calculated from five maximal repetitions of knee extension (KE) and knee flexion (KF) for each session. Total work at 180° s-1 was determined from the area under the torque versus displacement curve during 20 maximal repetitions of KE and KF. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high for both devices (0.90-0.99). Only one dependent measure, KE peak torque at 60° s -1 exhibited good concordance between devices (p = 0.92) and a small average difference (0.9 ± 17.3 N m). Conclusion: MARES demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and thus should serve as a good tool to monitor in-flight strength changes. However, due to poor agreement with NORM, it is not advisable to compare absolute values obtained on these devices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-9
Number of pages7
JournalActa Astronautica
Volume92
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2013

Fingerprint

Dynamometers
Muscle
Torque
Space stations
Testing
Microgravity
Durability

Keywords

  • ISS
  • Microgravity
  • Peak torque In-flight
  • Spaceflight
  • Strength test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aerospace Engineering

Cite this

A ground-based comparison of the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) and a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer. / English, Kirk L.; Hackney, Kyle J.; De Witt, John K.; Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J.; Goetchius, Elizabeth L.; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

In: Acta Astronautica, Vol. 92, No. 1, 01.01.2013, p. 3-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

English, Kirk L. ; Hackney, Kyle J. ; De Witt, John K. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J. ; Goetchius, Elizabeth L. ; Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L. / A ground-based comparison of the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) and a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer. In: Acta Astronautica. 2013 ; Vol. 92, No. 1. pp. 3-9.
@article{0e0aa86695e14dfe92dd6b9d8f39e61e,
title = "A ground-based comparison of the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) and a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer",
abstract = "Introduction: International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers perform muscle strength and endurance testing pre- and postflight to assess the physiologic adaptations associated with long-duration exposure to microgravity. However, a reliable and standardized method to document strength changes in-flight has not been established. To address this issue, a proprietary dynamometer, the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) has been developed and flown aboard the ISS. The aims of this ground-based investigation were to: (1) evaluate the test-retest reliability of MARES and (2) determine its agreement with a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer previously used for pre- and postflight medical testing. Methods: Six males (179.5 ± 4.7 cm; 82.0 ± 8.7 kg; 31.3 ± 4.0 yr) and four females (163.2 ± 7.3 cm; 63.2 ± 1.9 kg; 32.3 ± 6.8 yr) completed two testing sessions on a HUMAC NORM isokinetic dynamometer (NORM) and two sessions on MARES using a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over design. Peak torque values at 60° and 180° s-1 were calculated from five maximal repetitions of knee extension (KE) and knee flexion (KF) for each session. Total work at 180° s-1 was determined from the area under the torque versus displacement curve during 20 maximal repetitions of KE and KF. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high for both devices (0.90-0.99). Only one dependent measure, KE peak torque at 60° s -1 exhibited good concordance between devices (p = 0.92) and a small average difference (0.9 ± 17.3 N m). Conclusion: MARES demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and thus should serve as a good tool to monitor in-flight strength changes. However, due to poor agreement with NORM, it is not advisable to compare absolute values obtained on these devices.",
keywords = "ISS, Microgravity, Peak torque In-flight, Spaceflight, Strength test",
author = "English, {Kirk L.} and Hackney, {Kyle J.} and {De Witt}, {John K.} and Ploutz-Snyder, {Robert J.} and Goetchius, {Elizabeth L.} and Ploutz-Snyder, {Lori L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "92",
pages = "3--9",
journal = "Acta Astronautica",
issn = "0094-5765",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A ground-based comparison of the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) and a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer

AU - English, Kirk L.

AU - Hackney, Kyle J.

AU - De Witt, John K.

AU - Ploutz-Snyder, Robert J.

AU - Goetchius, Elizabeth L.

AU - Ploutz-Snyder, Lori L.

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Introduction: International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers perform muscle strength and endurance testing pre- and postflight to assess the physiologic adaptations associated with long-duration exposure to microgravity. However, a reliable and standardized method to document strength changes in-flight has not been established. To address this issue, a proprietary dynamometer, the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) has been developed and flown aboard the ISS. The aims of this ground-based investigation were to: (1) evaluate the test-retest reliability of MARES and (2) determine its agreement with a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer previously used for pre- and postflight medical testing. Methods: Six males (179.5 ± 4.7 cm; 82.0 ± 8.7 kg; 31.3 ± 4.0 yr) and four females (163.2 ± 7.3 cm; 63.2 ± 1.9 kg; 32.3 ± 6.8 yr) completed two testing sessions on a HUMAC NORM isokinetic dynamometer (NORM) and two sessions on MARES using a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over design. Peak torque values at 60° and 180° s-1 were calculated from five maximal repetitions of knee extension (KE) and knee flexion (KF) for each session. Total work at 180° s-1 was determined from the area under the torque versus displacement curve during 20 maximal repetitions of KE and KF. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high for both devices (0.90-0.99). Only one dependent measure, KE peak torque at 60° s -1 exhibited good concordance between devices (p = 0.92) and a small average difference (0.9 ± 17.3 N m). Conclusion: MARES demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and thus should serve as a good tool to monitor in-flight strength changes. However, due to poor agreement with NORM, it is not advisable to compare absolute values obtained on these devices.

AB - Introduction: International Space Station (ISS) crewmembers perform muscle strength and endurance testing pre- and postflight to assess the physiologic adaptations associated with long-duration exposure to microgravity. However, a reliable and standardized method to document strength changes in-flight has not been established. To address this issue, a proprietary dynamometer, the Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) has been developed and flown aboard the ISS. The aims of this ground-based investigation were to: (1) evaluate the test-retest reliability of MARES and (2) determine its agreement with a commercially available isokinetic dynamometer previously used for pre- and postflight medical testing. Methods: Six males (179.5 ± 4.7 cm; 82.0 ± 8.7 kg; 31.3 ± 4.0 yr) and four females (163.2 ± 7.3 cm; 63.2 ± 1.9 kg; 32.3 ± 6.8 yr) completed two testing sessions on a HUMAC NORM isokinetic dynamometer (NORM) and two sessions on MARES using a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over design. Peak torque values at 60° and 180° s-1 were calculated from five maximal repetitions of knee extension (KE) and knee flexion (KF) for each session. Total work at 180° s-1 was determined from the area under the torque versus displacement curve during 20 maximal repetitions of KE and KF. Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients were relatively high for both devices (0.90-0.99). Only one dependent measure, KE peak torque at 60° s -1 exhibited good concordance between devices (p = 0.92) and a small average difference (0.9 ± 17.3 N m). Conclusion: MARES demonstrated acceptable test-retest reliability and thus should serve as a good tool to monitor in-flight strength changes. However, due to poor agreement with NORM, it is not advisable to compare absolute values obtained on these devices.

KW - ISS

KW - Microgravity

KW - Peak torque In-flight

KW - Spaceflight

KW - Strength test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885573252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885573252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.06.015

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84885573252

VL - 92

SP - 3

EP - 9

JO - Acta Astronautica

JF - Acta Astronautica

SN - 0094-5765

IS - 1

ER -