A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management

Aurora B. Le, Lesley Witter, Jocelyn J. Herstein, Katelyn C. Jelden, Elizabeth L Beam, Shawn G. Gibbs, John-Martin J Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector—which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains— was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population. Methods: Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment. Results: One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees’ willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40% of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers. Conclusions: Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)674-680
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene
Volume14
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2 2017

Fingerprint

Disease Management
Communicable Diseases
Education
Industry
Organizations
Occupational Health
Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers
Risk Management
Practice Guidelines
Surveys and Questionnaires
Population

Keywords

  • Death care
  • Ebola virus disease
  • Highly infectious remains
  • Infectious disease education
  • Infectious disease training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management. / Le, Aurora B.; Witter, Lesley; Herstein, Jocelyn J.; Jelden, Katelyn C.; Beam, Elizabeth L; Gibbs, Shawn G.; Lowe, John-Martin J.

In: Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, Vol. 14, No. 9, 02.09.2017, p. 674-680.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5117c8a2be9c4397bf5dfe06bc08d345,
title = "A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management",
abstract = "Purpose: A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector—which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains— was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population. Methods: Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment. Results: One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees’ willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40{\%} of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers. Conclusions: Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.",
keywords = "Death care, Ebola virus disease, Highly infectious remains, Infectious disease education, Infectious disease training",
author = "Le, {Aurora B.} and Lesley Witter and Herstein, {Jocelyn J.} and Jelden, {Katelyn C.} and Beam, {Elizabeth L} and Gibbs, {Shawn G.} and Lowe, {John-Martin J}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15459624.2017.1319570",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "674--680",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A gap analysis of the United States death care sector to determine training and education needs pertaining to highly infectious disease mitigation and management

AU - Le, Aurora B.

AU - Witter, Lesley

AU - Herstein, Jocelyn J.

AU - Jelden, Katelyn C.

AU - Beam, Elizabeth L

AU - Gibbs, Shawn G.

AU - Lowe, John-Martin J

PY - 2017/9/2

Y1 - 2017/9/2

N2 - Purpose: A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector—which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains— was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population. Methods: Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment. Results: One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees’ willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40% of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers. Conclusions: Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.

AB - Purpose: A United States industry-specific gap analysis survey of the death care sector—which comprises organizations and businesses affiliated with the funeral industry and the handling of human remains— was developed, the results analyzed, and training and education needs in relation to highly infectious disease mitigation and management were explored in an effort to identify where occupational health and safety can be enhanced in this worker population. Methods: Collaborating national death care organizations distributed the 47-question electronic survey. N = 424 surveys were initiated and results recorded. The survey collected death care sector-specific information pertaining to the comfortability and willingness to handle highly infectious remains; perceptions of readiness, current policies and procedures in place to address highly infectious diseases; current highly infectious disease training levels, available resources, and personal protective equipment. Results: One-third of respondents have been trained on how to manage highly infectious remains. There was a discrepancy between Supervisor/Management and Employee/Worker perceptions on employees’ willingness and comfortability to manage potentially highly infectious remains. More than 40% of respondents did not know the correct routes of transmission for viral hemorrhagic fevers. Conclusions: Results suggest death care workers could benefit from increasing up-to-date industry-specific training and education on highly infectious disease risk mitigation and management. Professional death care sector organizations are positioned to disseminate information, training, and best practices.

KW - Death care

KW - Ebola virus disease

KW - Highly infectious remains

KW - Infectious disease education

KW - Infectious disease training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044674287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044674287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15459624.2017.1319570

DO - 10.1080/15459624.2017.1319570

M3 - Article

C2 - 28609169

AN - SCOPUS:85044674287

VL - 14

SP - 674

EP - 680

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 9

ER -