A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed

Nam N. Pham, Jong-Hoon Youn, Chulho Won

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006
Pages276-281
Number of pages6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2006
EventIEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing - Taichung, Taiwan, Province of China
Duration: Jun 5 2006Jun 7 2006

Publication series

NameProceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing
Volume2006 I

Conference

ConferenceIEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing
CountryTaiwan, Province of China
CityTaichung
Period6/5/066/7/06

Fingerprint

Network routing
Testbeds
Routing protocols
Wireless sensor networks
Medical applications
Energy utilization
Network protocols

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Pham, N. N., Youn, J-H., & Won, C. (2006). A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. In Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006 (pp. 276-281). [1636287] (Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing; Vol. 2006 I). https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2006.1

A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. / Pham, Nam N.; Youn, Jong-Hoon; Won, Chulho.

Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006. 2006. p. 276-281 1636287 (Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing; Vol. 2006 I).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Pham, NN, Youn, J-H & Won, C 2006, A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. in Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006., 1636287, Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, vol. 2006 I, pp. 276-281, IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing, Taichung, Taiwan, Province of China, 6/5/06. https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2006.1
Pham NN, Youn J-H, Won C. A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. In Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006. 2006. p. 276-281. 1636287. (Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing). https://doi.org/10.1109/SUTC.2006.1
Pham, Nam N. ; Youn, Jong-Hoon ; Won, Chulho. / A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed. Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006. 2006. pp. 276-281 (Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing).
@inproceedings{b83c0cedacb1493886ae37fdd41a5c5a,
title = "A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed",
abstract = "In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.",
author = "Pham, {Nam N.} and Jong-Hoon Youn and Chulho Won",
year = "2006",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1109/SUTC.2006.1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0769525539",
series = "Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing",
pages = "276--281",
booktitle = "Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of wireless sensor network routing protocols on an experimental testbed

AU - Pham, Nam N.

AU - Youn, Jong-Hoon

AU - Won, Chulho

PY - 2006/12/15

Y1 - 2006/12/15

N2 - In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.

AB - In this paper, we present a comparison of four wireless sensor network protocols: MultiHopRouter, TinyAODV(Ad-hoc On-demand Distance-Vector), GF (Greedy Forwarding), and GF-RSSI (Greedy Forward with Received Signal Strength Indication). Performance measurement was conducted on a wireless sensor network testbed for medical application research. Based on our measurements, GF-RSSI performs well in various operating conditions. Especially, it shows a high success rate of packet delivery and moderate energy consumption.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33845437541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33845437541&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/SUTC.2006.1

DO - 10.1109/SUTC.2006.1

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:33845437541

SN - 0769525539

SN - 9780769525532

T3 - Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Sensor Networks, Ubiquitous, and Trustworthy Computing

SP - 276

EP - 281

BT - Proceedings - Thirteenth International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, TIME 2006

ER -