A comparison of two laboratory-based approaches for teaching introductory computer science

Cindy L. Corritore, Betty L. Hickman, Neal Grandgenett, Robert Hitchcock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper examines the role of a laboratory in the teaching of introductory computer science courses. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine and compare the use of two specific laboratory-based alternatives, one in which students worked individually in a hands-on environment, and one in which students worked in an interactive group setting led by an instructor. Data were collected on general student performance, class attrition, and course-related perceptions in both settings. The results indicated that students in both the hands-on and the interactive demonstration laboratory sections performed relatively equally in the course activities. Also, an examination of student attrition rates noted a lower rate for each of the laboratory approaches when compared to a traditional lecture approach. Student opinions examined within the study suggested that students perceived a real need for laboratory-based instruction in introductory computer programming courses, but that they were very concerned about the extra work and class time that it might represent. Finally, the suggestion is made that laboratory instruction using interactive demonstration represents a less expensive, and perhaps an excellent intermediate alternative to more hands-on instruction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)292-301
Number of pages10
JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
Volume36
Issue number4
StatePublished - Nov 1 1999

Fingerprint

computer science
Teaching
student
instruction
teaching of computer science
instructor
programming
examination
performance
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

A comparison of two laboratory-based approaches for teaching introductory computer science. / Corritore, Cindy L.; Hickman, Betty L.; Grandgenett, Neal; Hitchcock, Robert.

In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 36, No. 4, 01.11.1999, p. 292-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7eec5e8a0c404ab48ab601360be9e90e,
title = "A comparison of two laboratory-based approaches for teaching introductory computer science",
abstract = "This paper examines the role of a laboratory in the teaching of introductory computer science courses. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine and compare the use of two specific laboratory-based alternatives, one in which students worked individually in a hands-on environment, and one in which students worked in an interactive group setting led by an instructor. Data were collected on general student performance, class attrition, and course-related perceptions in both settings. The results indicated that students in both the hands-on and the interactive demonstration laboratory sections performed relatively equally in the course activities. Also, an examination of student attrition rates noted a lower rate for each of the laboratory approaches when compared to a traditional lecture approach. Student opinions examined within the study suggested that students perceived a real need for laboratory-based instruction in introductory computer programming courses, but that they were very concerned about the extra work and class time that it might represent. Finally, the suggestion is made that laboratory instruction using interactive demonstration represents a less expensive, and perhaps an excellent intermediate alternative to more hands-on instruction.",
author = "Corritore, {Cindy L.} and Hickman, {Betty L.} and Neal Grandgenett and Robert Hitchcock",
year = "1999",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "292--301",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Training International",
issn = "1355-8005",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of two laboratory-based approaches for teaching introductory computer science

AU - Corritore, Cindy L.

AU - Hickman, Betty L.

AU - Grandgenett, Neal

AU - Hitchcock, Robert

PY - 1999/11/1

Y1 - 1999/11/1

N2 - This paper examines the role of a laboratory in the teaching of introductory computer science courses. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine and compare the use of two specific laboratory-based alternatives, one in which students worked individually in a hands-on environment, and one in which students worked in an interactive group setting led by an instructor. Data were collected on general student performance, class attrition, and course-related perceptions in both settings. The results indicated that students in both the hands-on and the interactive demonstration laboratory sections performed relatively equally in the course activities. Also, an examination of student attrition rates noted a lower rate for each of the laboratory approaches when compared to a traditional lecture approach. Student opinions examined within the study suggested that students perceived a real need for laboratory-based instruction in introductory computer programming courses, but that they were very concerned about the extra work and class time that it might represent. Finally, the suggestion is made that laboratory instruction using interactive demonstration represents a less expensive, and perhaps an excellent intermediate alternative to more hands-on instruction.

AB - This paper examines the role of a laboratory in the teaching of introductory computer science courses. The purpose of this exploratory study was to examine and compare the use of two specific laboratory-based alternatives, one in which students worked individually in a hands-on environment, and one in which students worked in an interactive group setting led by an instructor. Data were collected on general student performance, class attrition, and course-related perceptions in both settings. The results indicated that students in both the hands-on and the interactive demonstration laboratory sections performed relatively equally in the course activities. Also, an examination of student attrition rates noted a lower rate for each of the laboratory approaches when compared to a traditional lecture approach. Student opinions examined within the study suggested that students perceived a real need for laboratory-based instruction in introductory computer programming courses, but that they were very concerned about the extra work and class time that it might represent. Finally, the suggestion is made that laboratory instruction using interactive demonstration represents a less expensive, and perhaps an excellent intermediate alternative to more hands-on instruction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033235539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033235539&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033235539

VL - 36

SP - 292

EP - 301

JO - Innovations in Education and Training International

JF - Innovations in Education and Training International

SN - 1355-8005

IS - 4

ER -