A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children

Daiel A. Notterman, Frank V. Castello, Charlotte Steinberg, Bruce M. Greenwald, John E. O'Loughlin, Jeffrey P. Gold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To evaluate the pulsed Doppler cardiac output method as a noninvasive means for determining cardiac output in critically ill children, we performed paired pulsed Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in 17 critically ill children. Commercially available equipment, specifically designed for this purpose, was employed. Forty paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler determinations were made. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements (pulsed Doppler=0.84 thermodilution +0.39; r=0.79, p<0.01). The ranges of thermodilution measurements (1.02 to 6.26 L/min; median 2.77 L/min) and pulsed Doppler measurements (1.13 to 6.35 L/min; median 2.57 L/min) were not different (p=0.25). However, differences between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements were large (-3.13 to 2.03 L/min; median 0.12 L/min), and the percentage difference between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements ranged from 0.41% to 102.5% (median 12.7%). A discrepancy of 15% or more between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler was encountered in 18 (45%) of 40 of paired measurements (95% confidence interval: 29% to 61%), and one fourth of the paired measurements differed by more than 25%. We conclude that, as employed in this study, pulsed Doppler cardiac output determination is not sufficiently representative of the thermodilution output to be employed for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-560
Number of pages7
JournalThe Journal of Pediatrics
Volume115
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1989

Fingerprint

Thermodilution
Critical Illness
Cardiac Output
Individuality
Hemodynamics
Confidence Intervals
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children. / Notterman, Daiel A.; Castello, Frank V.; Steinberg, Charlotte; Greenwald, Bruce M.; O'Loughlin, John E.; Gold, Jeffrey P.

In: The Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 115, No. 4, 10.1989, p. 554-560.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Notterman, Daiel A. ; Castello, Frank V. ; Steinberg, Charlotte ; Greenwald, Bruce M. ; O'Loughlin, John E. ; Gold, Jeffrey P. / A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children. In: The Journal of Pediatrics. 1989 ; Vol. 115, No. 4. pp. 554-560.
@article{5bf71c12fd004491aeabb23b83355ad0,
title = "A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children",
abstract = "To evaluate the pulsed Doppler cardiac output method as a noninvasive means for determining cardiac output in critically ill children, we performed paired pulsed Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in 17 critically ill children. Commercially available equipment, specifically designed for this purpose, was employed. Forty paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler determinations were made. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements (pulsed Doppler=0.84 thermodilution +0.39; r=0.79, p<0.01). The ranges of thermodilution measurements (1.02 to 6.26 L/min; median 2.77 L/min) and pulsed Doppler measurements (1.13 to 6.35 L/min; median 2.57 L/min) were not different (p=0.25). However, differences between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements were large (-3.13 to 2.03 L/min; median 0.12 L/min), and the percentage difference between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements ranged from 0.41{\%} to 102.5{\%} (median 12.7{\%}). A discrepancy of 15{\%} or more between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler was encountered in 18 (45{\%}) of 40 of paired measurements (95{\%} confidence interval: 29{\%} to 61{\%}), and one fourth of the paired measurements differed by more than 25{\%}. We conclude that, as employed in this study, pulsed Doppler cardiac output determination is not sufficiently representative of the thermodilution output to be employed for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.",
author = "Notterman, {Daiel A.} and Castello, {Frank V.} and Charlotte Steinberg and Greenwald, {Bruce M.} and O'Loughlin, {John E.} and Gold, {Jeffrey P.}",
year = "1989",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80280-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "554--560",
journal = "Journal of Pediatrics",
issn = "0022-3476",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children

AU - Notterman, Daiel A.

AU - Castello, Frank V.

AU - Steinberg, Charlotte

AU - Greenwald, Bruce M.

AU - O'Loughlin, John E.

AU - Gold, Jeffrey P.

PY - 1989/10

Y1 - 1989/10

N2 - To evaluate the pulsed Doppler cardiac output method as a noninvasive means for determining cardiac output in critically ill children, we performed paired pulsed Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in 17 critically ill children. Commercially available equipment, specifically designed for this purpose, was employed. Forty paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler determinations were made. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements (pulsed Doppler=0.84 thermodilution +0.39; r=0.79, p<0.01). The ranges of thermodilution measurements (1.02 to 6.26 L/min; median 2.77 L/min) and pulsed Doppler measurements (1.13 to 6.35 L/min; median 2.57 L/min) were not different (p=0.25). However, differences between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements were large (-3.13 to 2.03 L/min; median 0.12 L/min), and the percentage difference between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements ranged from 0.41% to 102.5% (median 12.7%). A discrepancy of 15% or more between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler was encountered in 18 (45%) of 40 of paired measurements (95% confidence interval: 29% to 61%), and one fourth of the paired measurements differed by more than 25%. We conclude that, as employed in this study, pulsed Doppler cardiac output determination is not sufficiently representative of the thermodilution output to be employed for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.

AB - To evaluate the pulsed Doppler cardiac output method as a noninvasive means for determining cardiac output in critically ill children, we performed paired pulsed Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output determinations in 17 critically ill children. Commercially available equipment, specifically designed for this purpose, was employed. Forty paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler determinations were made. There was a significant correlation between the two measurements (pulsed Doppler=0.84 thermodilution +0.39; r=0.79, p<0.01). The ranges of thermodilution measurements (1.02 to 6.26 L/min; median 2.77 L/min) and pulsed Doppler measurements (1.13 to 6.35 L/min; median 2.57 L/min) were not different (p=0.25). However, differences between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements were large (-3.13 to 2.03 L/min; median 0.12 L/min), and the percentage difference between individual paired thermodilution and pulsed Doppler measurements ranged from 0.41% to 102.5% (median 12.7%). A discrepancy of 15% or more between thermodilution and pulsed Doppler was encountered in 18 (45%) of 40 of paired measurements (95% confidence interval: 29% to 61%), and one fourth of the paired measurements differed by more than 25%. We conclude that, as employed in this study, pulsed Doppler cardiac output determination is not sufficiently representative of the thermodilution output to be employed for hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill children.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024435408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024435408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80280-X

DO - 10.1016/S0022-3476(89)80280-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 2795345

AN - SCOPUS:0024435408

VL - 115

SP - 554

EP - 560

JO - Journal of Pediatrics

JF - Journal of Pediatrics

SN - 0022-3476

IS - 4

ER -