A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area

Jason M. DeFreitas, Travis W. Beck, Matt S. Stock, Michael A. Dillon, Vanessa D. Sherk, Jeffrey R. Stout, Joel T. Cramer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The ability to accurately estimate changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) could be a useful tool for strength and conditioning practitioners to assess the effectiveness of a resistance training program. The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the reliability of 2 separate anthropometric-based field estimations of thigh muscle CSA with that of a more accurate, sophisticated imaging technique (peripheral quantitative computed tomography [pQCT] scanner) and (b) to determine if the field methods would be sensitive enough to detect changes in CSA during a resistance training program. Twenty-five healthy, untrained men completed 8 weeks of resistance training. Cross-sectional area testing occurred twice before the start of training, for reliability and again every 2 weeks during the study. Testing consisted of a pQCT scan of the right thigh followed by circumference and skinfold measurements. Two separate equations (Moritani and deVries [M + D] and Housh multiple regression [HMR]) were used to estimate CSA from the anthropometric data. The M + D and HMR methods demonstrated intraclass correlations of 0.983 and 0.961, respectively, but both significantly underestimated thigh muscle CSA when compared to the pQCT. This error was consistent, however, and consequently, the field methods were able to demonstrate increases in muscle CSA with a pattern similar to those from the pQCT. Thus, these equations can be useful tools to evaluate an athlete's progress toward the goal of increasing muscle CSA. It is the authors' hope that the present study will increase awareness among practitioners of these useful field methods for estimating training-induced changes in muscle CSA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2383-2389
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of strength and conditioning research
Volume24
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2010

Fingerprint

Teaching
Muscles
Resistance Training
Thigh
Tomography
Hope
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Education
Aptitude
Athletes

Keywords

  • Anthropometry
  • Hypertrophy
  • pQCT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area. / DeFreitas, Jason M.; Beck, Travis W.; Stock, Matt S.; Dillon, Michael A.; Sherk, Vanessa D.; Stout, Jeffrey R.; Cramer, Joel T.

In: Journal of strength and conditioning research, Vol. 24, No. 9, 01.09.2010, p. 2383-2389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeFreitas, Jason M. ; Beck, Travis W. ; Stock, Matt S. ; Dillon, Michael A. ; Sherk, Vanessa D. ; Stout, Jeffrey R. ; Cramer, Joel T. / A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area. In: Journal of strength and conditioning research. 2010 ; Vol. 24, No. 9. pp. 2383-2389.
@article{3a278d1e1eb54ca788d1e911f796e556,
title = "A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area",
abstract = "The ability to accurately estimate changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) could be a useful tool for strength and conditioning practitioners to assess the effectiveness of a resistance training program. The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the reliability of 2 separate anthropometric-based field estimations of thigh muscle CSA with that of a more accurate, sophisticated imaging technique (peripheral quantitative computed tomography [pQCT] scanner) and (b) to determine if the field methods would be sensitive enough to detect changes in CSA during a resistance training program. Twenty-five healthy, untrained men completed 8 weeks of resistance training. Cross-sectional area testing occurred twice before the start of training, for reliability and again every 2 weeks during the study. Testing consisted of a pQCT scan of the right thigh followed by circumference and skinfold measurements. Two separate equations (Moritani and deVries [M + D] and Housh multiple regression [HMR]) were used to estimate CSA from the anthropometric data. The M + D and HMR methods demonstrated intraclass correlations of 0.983 and 0.961, respectively, but both significantly underestimated thigh muscle CSA when compared to the pQCT. This error was consistent, however, and consequently, the field methods were able to demonstrate increases in muscle CSA with a pattern similar to those from the pQCT. Thus, these equations can be useful tools to evaluate an athlete's progress toward the goal of increasing muscle CSA. It is the authors' hope that the present study will increase awareness among practitioners of these useful field methods for estimating training-induced changes in muscle CSA.",
keywords = "Anthropometry, Hypertrophy, pQCT",
author = "DeFreitas, {Jason M.} and Beck, {Travis W.} and Stock, {Matt S.} and Dillon, {Michael A.} and Sherk, {Vanessa D.} and Stout, {Jeffrey R.} and Cramer, {Joel T.}",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ec86f3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "2383--2389",
journal = "Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research",
issn = "1064-8011",
publisher = "NSCA National Strength and Conditioning Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area

AU - DeFreitas, Jason M.

AU - Beck, Travis W.

AU - Stock, Matt S.

AU - Dillon, Michael A.

AU - Sherk, Vanessa D.

AU - Stout, Jeffrey R.

AU - Cramer, Joel T.

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - The ability to accurately estimate changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) could be a useful tool for strength and conditioning practitioners to assess the effectiveness of a resistance training program. The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the reliability of 2 separate anthropometric-based field estimations of thigh muscle CSA with that of a more accurate, sophisticated imaging technique (peripheral quantitative computed tomography [pQCT] scanner) and (b) to determine if the field methods would be sensitive enough to detect changes in CSA during a resistance training program. Twenty-five healthy, untrained men completed 8 weeks of resistance training. Cross-sectional area testing occurred twice before the start of training, for reliability and again every 2 weeks during the study. Testing consisted of a pQCT scan of the right thigh followed by circumference and skinfold measurements. Two separate equations (Moritani and deVries [M + D] and Housh multiple regression [HMR]) were used to estimate CSA from the anthropometric data. The M + D and HMR methods demonstrated intraclass correlations of 0.983 and 0.961, respectively, but both significantly underestimated thigh muscle CSA when compared to the pQCT. This error was consistent, however, and consequently, the field methods were able to demonstrate increases in muscle CSA with a pattern similar to those from the pQCT. Thus, these equations can be useful tools to evaluate an athlete's progress toward the goal of increasing muscle CSA. It is the authors' hope that the present study will increase awareness among practitioners of these useful field methods for estimating training-induced changes in muscle CSA.

AB - The ability to accurately estimate changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) could be a useful tool for strength and conditioning practitioners to assess the effectiveness of a resistance training program. The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the reliability of 2 separate anthropometric-based field estimations of thigh muscle CSA with that of a more accurate, sophisticated imaging technique (peripheral quantitative computed tomography [pQCT] scanner) and (b) to determine if the field methods would be sensitive enough to detect changes in CSA during a resistance training program. Twenty-five healthy, untrained men completed 8 weeks of resistance training. Cross-sectional area testing occurred twice before the start of training, for reliability and again every 2 weeks during the study. Testing consisted of a pQCT scan of the right thigh followed by circumference and skinfold measurements. Two separate equations (Moritani and deVries [M + D] and Housh multiple regression [HMR]) were used to estimate CSA from the anthropometric data. The M + D and HMR methods demonstrated intraclass correlations of 0.983 and 0.961, respectively, but both significantly underestimated thigh muscle CSA when compared to the pQCT. This error was consistent, however, and consequently, the field methods were able to demonstrate increases in muscle CSA with a pattern similar to those from the pQCT. Thus, these equations can be useful tools to evaluate an athlete's progress toward the goal of increasing muscle CSA. It is the authors' hope that the present study will increase awareness among practitioners of these useful field methods for estimating training-induced changes in muscle CSA.

KW - Anthropometry

KW - Hypertrophy

KW - pQCT

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956935094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956935094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ec86f3

DO - 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ec86f3

M3 - Article

C2 - 20802282

AN - SCOPUS:77956935094

VL - 24

SP - 2383

EP - 2389

JO - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

JF - Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

SN - 1064-8011

IS - 9

ER -