A comparison of self-reports of distress and affective disorder diagnoses in rheumatoid arthritis

A receiver operator characteristic analysis

Julia McQuillan, Judith Fifield, T. Joseph Sheehan, Susan Reisine, Howard Tennen, Victor Hesselbrock, Naomi Rothfield

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. To compare 3 commonly used psychiatric symptom checklists (the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D], the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales [EMAS]) to determine their sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate between a disorder (Major Depression [MD], Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]), and no disorder. To compare the checklists for their ability to discriminate between type of disorder (MD and GAD). To evaluate the discriminant ability of the subscales, particularly positive affect; whether the somatic items in the CES-D artificially inflate affective scores; and the optimal cut off score for the CES-D. Methods. We compared the 3 scales to diagnostic criterion of MD, GAD, and comorbid disorder using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses. The sample consisted of a national panel of 415 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Results. Each of the scales had high sensitivity and specificity (areas under the curve: CES-D = 0.92, negative affect = 0.88, positive affect and EMAS = 0.82). The CES-D, however, demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity than the positive affect and the EMAS, but not the negative affect scale. Conclusion. All 3 self-reports have high combined sensitivity and specificity as measures of affective disorders among RA patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-376
Number of pages9
JournalArthritis Care and Research
Volume49
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 15 2003

Fingerprint

Mood Disorders
Self Report
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Depression
Aptitude
Epidemiologic Studies
Anxiety Disorders
Sensitivity and Specificity
Anxiety
Checklist
Area Under Curve
Psychiatry
Appointments and Schedules
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis

Keywords

  • Affective disorder
  • Distress
  • ROC

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology

Cite this

A comparison of self-reports of distress and affective disorder diagnoses in rheumatoid arthritis : A receiver operator characteristic analysis. / McQuillan, Julia; Fifield, Judith; Sheehan, T. Joseph; Reisine, Susan; Tennen, Howard; Hesselbrock, Victor; Rothfield, Naomi.

In: Arthritis Care and Research, Vol. 49, No. 3, 15.06.2003, p. 368-376.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McQuillan, Julia ; Fifield, Judith ; Sheehan, T. Joseph ; Reisine, Susan ; Tennen, Howard ; Hesselbrock, Victor ; Rothfield, Naomi. / A comparison of self-reports of distress and affective disorder diagnoses in rheumatoid arthritis : A receiver operator characteristic analysis. In: Arthritis Care and Research. 2003 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 368-376.
@article{6106ee5bc06f4da293921cd0b0c66f45,
title = "A comparison of self-reports of distress and affective disorder diagnoses in rheumatoid arthritis: A receiver operator characteristic analysis",
abstract = "Objective. To compare 3 commonly used psychiatric symptom checklists (the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D], the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales [EMAS]) to determine their sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate between a disorder (Major Depression [MD], Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]), and no disorder. To compare the checklists for their ability to discriminate between type of disorder (MD and GAD). To evaluate the discriminant ability of the subscales, particularly positive affect; whether the somatic items in the CES-D artificially inflate affective scores; and the optimal cut off score for the CES-D. Methods. We compared the 3 scales to diagnostic criterion of MD, GAD, and comorbid disorder using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses. The sample consisted of a national panel of 415 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Results. Each of the scales had high sensitivity and specificity (areas under the curve: CES-D = 0.92, negative affect = 0.88, positive affect and EMAS = 0.82). The CES-D, however, demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity than the positive affect and the EMAS, but not the negative affect scale. Conclusion. All 3 self-reports have high combined sensitivity and specificity as measures of affective disorders among RA patients.",
keywords = "Affective disorder, Distress, ROC",
author = "Julia McQuillan and Judith Fifield and Sheehan, {T. Joseph} and Susan Reisine and Howard Tennen and Victor Hesselbrock and Naomi Rothfield",
year = "2003",
month = "6",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "368--376",
journal = "Arthritis and Rheumatism",
issn = "2151-4658",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of self-reports of distress and affective disorder diagnoses in rheumatoid arthritis

T2 - A receiver operator characteristic analysis

AU - McQuillan, Julia

AU - Fifield, Judith

AU - Sheehan, T. Joseph

AU - Reisine, Susan

AU - Tennen, Howard

AU - Hesselbrock, Victor

AU - Rothfield, Naomi

PY - 2003/6/15

Y1 - 2003/6/15

N2 - Objective. To compare 3 commonly used psychiatric symptom checklists (the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D], the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales [EMAS]) to determine their sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate between a disorder (Major Depression [MD], Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]), and no disorder. To compare the checklists for their ability to discriminate between type of disorder (MD and GAD). To evaluate the discriminant ability of the subscales, particularly positive affect; whether the somatic items in the CES-D artificially inflate affective scores; and the optimal cut off score for the CES-D. Methods. We compared the 3 scales to diagnostic criterion of MD, GAD, and comorbid disorder using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses. The sample consisted of a national panel of 415 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Results. Each of the scales had high sensitivity and specificity (areas under the curve: CES-D = 0.92, negative affect = 0.88, positive affect and EMAS = 0.82). The CES-D, however, demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity than the positive affect and the EMAS, but not the negative affect scale. Conclusion. All 3 self-reports have high combined sensitivity and specificity as measures of affective disorders among RA patients.

AB - Objective. To compare 3 commonly used psychiatric symptom checklists (the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D], the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, and the Endler Multidimensional Anxiety Scales [EMAS]) to determine their sensitivity, specificity, and ability to discriminate between a disorder (Major Depression [MD], Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD]), and no disorder. To compare the checklists for their ability to discriminate between type of disorder (MD and GAD). To evaluate the discriminant ability of the subscales, particularly positive affect; whether the somatic items in the CES-D artificially inflate affective scores; and the optimal cut off score for the CES-D. Methods. We compared the 3 scales to diagnostic criterion of MD, GAD, and comorbid disorder using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and logistic regression analyses. The sample consisted of a national panel of 415 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Results. Each of the scales had high sensitivity and specificity (areas under the curve: CES-D = 0.92, negative affect = 0.88, positive affect and EMAS = 0.82). The CES-D, however, demonstrated better sensitivity and specificity than the positive affect and the EMAS, but not the negative affect scale. Conclusion. All 3 self-reports have high combined sensitivity and specificity as measures of affective disorders among RA patients.

KW - Affective disorder

KW - Distress

KW - ROC

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037636749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037636749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 368

EP - 376

JO - Arthritis and Rheumatism

JF - Arthritis and Rheumatism

SN - 2151-4658

IS - 3

ER -