A Comparison of Organizational, Structural, and Relationship Effects on Subordinates' Upward Influence Choices

Kathleen Krone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research examined the extent to which organizational membership, centralization of authority and subordinates' perceptions of supervisory relationship quality affected how frequently they report using different types of tactics in their upward influence attempts. Participants from five different organizations were surveyed. A typology of upward influence tactics was created based on the extent to which: (1) the means employed to attempt influence are open or closed, and (2) the desired outcomes are openly expressed or left undisclosed. The resulting dependent variable consisted of three types of tactics: open upward influence, strategic upward influence, and political upward influence. MANOVA results indicated that while organizational membership, centralization of authority and leader-member exchange all significantly affect upward influence tactic choices, organizational membership explains more variance than do the other two independent variables.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-15
Number of pages15
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume40
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1992

Fingerprint

tactics
centralization
typology
leader

Keywords

  • Organizational membership
  • leader-member exchange
  • participation in decision making
  • upward influence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

A Comparison of Organizational, Structural, and Relationship Effects on Subordinates' Upward Influence Choices. / Krone, Kathleen.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, 01.01.1992, p. 1-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc1a53da4fd34da79ce2286170bb88e7,
title = "A Comparison of Organizational, Structural, and Relationship Effects on Subordinates' Upward Influence Choices",
abstract = "This research examined the extent to which organizational membership, centralization of authority and subordinates' perceptions of supervisory relationship quality affected how frequently they report using different types of tactics in their upward influence attempts. Participants from five different organizations were surveyed. A typology of upward influence tactics was created based on the extent to which: (1) the means employed to attempt influence are open or closed, and (2) the desired outcomes are openly expressed or left undisclosed. The resulting dependent variable consisted of three types of tactics: open upward influence, strategic upward influence, and political upward influence. MANOVA results indicated that while organizational membership, centralization of authority and leader-member exchange all significantly affect upward influence tactic choices, organizational membership explains more variance than do the other two independent variables.",
keywords = "Organizational membership, leader-member exchange, participation in decision making, upward influence",
author = "Kathleen Krone",
year = "1992",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01463379209369816",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "1--15",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Organizational, Structural, and Relationship Effects on Subordinates' Upward Influence Choices

AU - Krone, Kathleen

PY - 1992/1/1

Y1 - 1992/1/1

N2 - This research examined the extent to which organizational membership, centralization of authority and subordinates' perceptions of supervisory relationship quality affected how frequently they report using different types of tactics in their upward influence attempts. Participants from five different organizations were surveyed. A typology of upward influence tactics was created based on the extent to which: (1) the means employed to attempt influence are open or closed, and (2) the desired outcomes are openly expressed or left undisclosed. The resulting dependent variable consisted of three types of tactics: open upward influence, strategic upward influence, and political upward influence. MANOVA results indicated that while organizational membership, centralization of authority and leader-member exchange all significantly affect upward influence tactic choices, organizational membership explains more variance than do the other two independent variables.

AB - This research examined the extent to which organizational membership, centralization of authority and subordinates' perceptions of supervisory relationship quality affected how frequently they report using different types of tactics in their upward influence attempts. Participants from five different organizations were surveyed. A typology of upward influence tactics was created based on the extent to which: (1) the means employed to attempt influence are open or closed, and (2) the desired outcomes are openly expressed or left undisclosed. The resulting dependent variable consisted of three types of tactics: open upward influence, strategic upward influence, and political upward influence. MANOVA results indicated that while organizational membership, centralization of authority and leader-member exchange all significantly affect upward influence tactic choices, organizational membership explains more variance than do the other two independent variables.

KW - Organizational membership

KW - leader-member exchange

KW - participation in decision making

KW - upward influence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948512869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948512869&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463379209369816

DO - 10.1080/01463379209369816

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 1

EP - 15

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 1

ER -