A comparison of clinical pediatric patient encounters in university medical center and community private practice settings

Fredrick A. McCurdy, Douglas M. Sell, Gary L. Beck, Katie Kerber, Robert E. Larzelere, Joseph H Evans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. - Growing numbers of medical students complete clerkships in community private practice (CPP) settings instead of the more traditional university-based clinics, yet few empirical studies have evaluated how setting type impacts clinical experiences, skill development, and student satisfaction. Objective. - This study compared the pediatric patient encounters seen by third-year medical students in university medical center (UMC) and CPP settings. Methods. - Third-year medical students were required to keep a log of all patients seen during their 8-week pediatric clerkship. Logbook entries were coded and then analyzed for differences in the number and distribution of the primary diagnostic categories between settings. Results. - CPP students reported, on the average, seeing over 3 times more patients than UMC students. The case mix distribution also differed significantly by setting. In general, CPP students reported seeing proportionately more routine illnesses, whereas UMC students reported seeing proportionately more uncommon disorders. Because CPP students saw more patients overall, they averaged more cases in almost all diagnostic categories. Conclusion. - CPP students received more clinical patient exposure than UMC students, except for patients in a few diagnostic categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-15
Number of pages4
JournalAmbulatory Pediatrics
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

Private Practice
Medical Students
Pediatrics
Students
Clinical Competence
Diagnosis-Related Groups

Keywords

  • Clerkship
  • Clinical exposure
  • Community private practice
  • Education
  • Medical center
  • Medical students
  • Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

A comparison of clinical pediatric patient encounters in university medical center and community private practice settings. / McCurdy, Fredrick A.; Sell, Douglas M.; Beck, Gary L.; Kerber, Katie; Larzelere, Robert E.; Evans, Joseph H.

In: Ambulatory Pediatrics, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 12-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McCurdy, Fredrick A. ; Sell, Douglas M. ; Beck, Gary L. ; Kerber, Katie ; Larzelere, Robert E. ; Evans, Joseph H. / A comparison of clinical pediatric patient encounters in university medical center and community private practice settings. In: Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2003 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 12-15.
@article{cd40a8379dd04330848d4046402246f2,
title = "A comparison of clinical pediatric patient encounters in university medical center and community private practice settings",
abstract = "Background. - Growing numbers of medical students complete clerkships in community private practice (CPP) settings instead of the more traditional university-based clinics, yet few empirical studies have evaluated how setting type impacts clinical experiences, skill development, and student satisfaction. Objective. - This study compared the pediatric patient encounters seen by third-year medical students in university medical center (UMC) and CPP settings. Methods. - Third-year medical students were required to keep a log of all patients seen during their 8-week pediatric clerkship. Logbook entries were coded and then analyzed for differences in the number and distribution of the primary diagnostic categories between settings. Results. - CPP students reported, on the average, seeing over 3 times more patients than UMC students. The case mix distribution also differed significantly by setting. In general, CPP students reported seeing proportionately more routine illnesses, whereas UMC students reported seeing proportionately more uncommon disorders. Because CPP students saw more patients overall, they averaged more cases in almost all diagnostic categories. Conclusion. - CPP students received more clinical patient exposure than UMC students, except for patients in a few diagnostic categories.",
keywords = "Clerkship, Clinical exposure, Community private practice, Education, Medical center, Medical students, Pediatrics",
author = "McCurdy, {Fredrick A.} and Sell, {Douglas M.} and Beck, {Gary L.} and Katie Kerber and Larzelere, {Robert E.} and Evans, {Joseph H}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0012:ACOCPP>2.0.CO;2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "12--15",
journal = "Academic Pediatrics",
issn = "1876-2859",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of clinical pediatric patient encounters in university medical center and community private practice settings

AU - McCurdy, Fredrick A.

AU - Sell, Douglas M.

AU - Beck, Gary L.

AU - Kerber, Katie

AU - Larzelere, Robert E.

AU - Evans, Joseph H

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Background. - Growing numbers of medical students complete clerkships in community private practice (CPP) settings instead of the more traditional university-based clinics, yet few empirical studies have evaluated how setting type impacts clinical experiences, skill development, and student satisfaction. Objective. - This study compared the pediatric patient encounters seen by third-year medical students in university medical center (UMC) and CPP settings. Methods. - Third-year medical students were required to keep a log of all patients seen during their 8-week pediatric clerkship. Logbook entries were coded and then analyzed for differences in the number and distribution of the primary diagnostic categories between settings. Results. - CPP students reported, on the average, seeing over 3 times more patients than UMC students. The case mix distribution also differed significantly by setting. In general, CPP students reported seeing proportionately more routine illnesses, whereas UMC students reported seeing proportionately more uncommon disorders. Because CPP students saw more patients overall, they averaged more cases in almost all diagnostic categories. Conclusion. - CPP students received more clinical patient exposure than UMC students, except for patients in a few diagnostic categories.

AB - Background. - Growing numbers of medical students complete clerkships in community private practice (CPP) settings instead of the more traditional university-based clinics, yet few empirical studies have evaluated how setting type impacts clinical experiences, skill development, and student satisfaction. Objective. - This study compared the pediatric patient encounters seen by third-year medical students in university medical center (UMC) and CPP settings. Methods. - Third-year medical students were required to keep a log of all patients seen during their 8-week pediatric clerkship. Logbook entries were coded and then analyzed for differences in the number and distribution of the primary diagnostic categories between settings. Results. - CPP students reported, on the average, seeing over 3 times more patients than UMC students. The case mix distribution also differed significantly by setting. In general, CPP students reported seeing proportionately more routine illnesses, whereas UMC students reported seeing proportionately more uncommon disorders. Because CPP students saw more patients overall, they averaged more cases in almost all diagnostic categories. Conclusion. - CPP students received more clinical patient exposure than UMC students, except for patients in a few diagnostic categories.

KW - Clerkship

KW - Clinical exposure

KW - Community private practice

KW - Education

KW - Medical center

KW - Medical students

KW - Pediatrics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037256486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037256486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0012:ACOCPP>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0012:ACOCPP>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 12

EP - 15

JO - Academic Pediatrics

JF - Academic Pediatrics

SN - 1876-2859

IS - 1

ER -