A Comparison Of Brief Functional Analyses With And Without Consequences

Nathan A. Call, Amanda N. Zangrillo, Caitlin H. Delfs, Addie J. Findley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Variations to traditional functional analysis methodology, such as brief functional analyses (BFAs), are prevalent in the literature. In the current evaluation, two types of BFAs were each conducted with five participants. In one, potential motivating operations (MOs) were presented, and problem behavior resulted in delivery of an associated consequence. In the other, the same MOs were presented, but no consequences were delivered. Results of the two BFAs were compared with respect to the conditions in which problem behavior occurred and the degree of differentiation between test and control conditions. Results across the BFA methodologies generally matched across all five participants. However, greater differentiation was observed in the BFA that did not include consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-39
Number of pages18
JournalBehavioral Interventions
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013

Fingerprint

Problem Behavior
Behavior Problems
Methodology
Functional Analysis
Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

A Comparison Of Brief Functional Analyses With And Without Consequences. / Call, Nathan A.; Zangrillo, Amanda N.; Delfs, Caitlin H.; Findley, Addie J.

In: Behavioral Interventions, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.02.2013, p. 22-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Call, Nathan A. ; Zangrillo, Amanda N. ; Delfs, Caitlin H. ; Findley, Addie J. / A Comparison Of Brief Functional Analyses With And Without Consequences. In: Behavioral Interventions. 2013 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 22-39.
@article{779d9c3953e849508d16c81120070931,
title = "A Comparison Of Brief Functional Analyses With And Without Consequences",
abstract = "Variations to traditional functional analysis methodology, such as brief functional analyses (BFAs), are prevalent in the literature. In the current evaluation, two types of BFAs were each conducted with five participants. In one, potential motivating operations (MOs) were presented, and problem behavior resulted in delivery of an associated consequence. In the other, the same MOs were presented, but no consequences were delivered. Results of the two BFAs were compared with respect to the conditions in which problem behavior occurred and the degree of differentiation between test and control conditions. Results across the BFA methodologies generally matched across all five participants. However, greater differentiation was observed in the BFA that did not include consequences.",
author = "Call, {Nathan A.} and Zangrillo, {Amanda N.} and Delfs, {Caitlin H.} and Findley, {Addie J.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/bin.1353",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "22--39",
journal = "Behavioral Interventions",
issn = "1072-0847",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison Of Brief Functional Analyses With And Without Consequences

AU - Call, Nathan A.

AU - Zangrillo, Amanda N.

AU - Delfs, Caitlin H.

AU - Findley, Addie J.

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Variations to traditional functional analysis methodology, such as brief functional analyses (BFAs), are prevalent in the literature. In the current evaluation, two types of BFAs were each conducted with five participants. In one, potential motivating operations (MOs) were presented, and problem behavior resulted in delivery of an associated consequence. In the other, the same MOs were presented, but no consequences were delivered. Results of the two BFAs were compared with respect to the conditions in which problem behavior occurred and the degree of differentiation between test and control conditions. Results across the BFA methodologies generally matched across all five participants. However, greater differentiation was observed in the BFA that did not include consequences.

AB - Variations to traditional functional analysis methodology, such as brief functional analyses (BFAs), are prevalent in the literature. In the current evaluation, two types of BFAs were each conducted with five participants. In one, potential motivating operations (MOs) were presented, and problem behavior resulted in delivery of an associated consequence. In the other, the same MOs were presented, but no consequences were delivered. Results of the two BFAs were compared with respect to the conditions in which problem behavior occurred and the degree of differentiation between test and control conditions. Results across the BFA methodologies generally matched across all five participants. However, greater differentiation was observed in the BFA that did not include consequences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874022460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874022460&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/bin.1353

DO - 10.1002/bin.1353

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84874022460

VL - 28

SP - 22

EP - 39

JO - Behavioral Interventions

JF - Behavioral Interventions

SN - 1072-0847

IS - 1

ER -