A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe

Devin DeLuna, Audrey Netzel, Jamie Dietze, Brett A. Begley, Jideofor K. Ndulue, Donny W. Suh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the accuracy and precision of a conventional intraocular syringe to the Suh precision syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic technique for periocular and intraocular injections. Methods: Participants were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water into a 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube and a sheep eye, first with the conventional syringe, and then with the SPS. The degree of needle movement during injection was video recorded and analyzed for forward-retraction movement and variability in movement. The volume of water injected into the PCR tube was also documented. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: As compared to the conventional syringe, the SPS had significantly less forwardretraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P=0.04). Similarly, the forwardretraction movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P=0.28). Conclusion: The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the SPS has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1833-1839
Number of pages7
JournalClinical Ophthalmology
Volume13
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Syringes
Intraocular Injections
Injections
Human Engineering
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Needles
Water
Sheep
Equipment and Supplies
Nonparametric Statistics

Keywords

  • Intraocular injection
  • Suh precision syringe

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe. / DeLuna, Devin; Netzel, Audrey; Dietze, Jamie; Begley, Brett A.; Ndulue, Jideofor K.; Suh, Donny W.

In: Clinical Ophthalmology, Vol. 13, 01.01.2019, p. 1833-1839.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

DeLuna, Devin ; Netzel, Audrey ; Dietze, Jamie ; Begley, Brett A. ; Ndulue, Jideofor K. ; Suh, Donny W. / A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe. In: Clinical Ophthalmology. 2019 ; Vol. 13. pp. 1833-1839.
@article{ccddb586194b471b81b7234d0497cc6d,
title = "A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare the accuracy and precision of a conventional intraocular syringe to the Suh precision syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic technique for periocular and intraocular injections. Methods: Participants were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water into a 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube and a sheep eye, first with the conventional syringe, and then with the SPS. The degree of needle movement during injection was video recorded and analyzed for forward-retraction movement and variability in movement. The volume of water injected into the PCR tube was also documented. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: As compared to the conventional syringe, the SPS had significantly less forwardretraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P=0.04). Similarly, the forwardretraction movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P=0.28). Conclusion: The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the SPS has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.",
keywords = "Intraocular injection, Suh precision syringe",
author = "Devin DeLuna and Audrey Netzel and Jamie Dietze and Begley, {Brett A.} and Ndulue, {Jideofor K.} and Suh, {Donny W.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2147/OPTH.S211485",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "1833--1839",
journal = "Clinical Ophthalmology",
issn = "1177-5467",
publisher = "Dove Medical Press Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison in precision and accuracy of the conventional syringe to the Suh precision syringe

AU - DeLuna, Devin

AU - Netzel, Audrey

AU - Dietze, Jamie

AU - Begley, Brett A.

AU - Ndulue, Jideofor K.

AU - Suh, Donny W.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare the accuracy and precision of a conventional intraocular syringe to the Suh precision syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic technique for periocular and intraocular injections. Methods: Participants were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water into a 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube and a sheep eye, first with the conventional syringe, and then with the SPS. The degree of needle movement during injection was video recorded and analyzed for forward-retraction movement and variability in movement. The volume of water injected into the PCR tube was also documented. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: As compared to the conventional syringe, the SPS had significantly less forwardretraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P=0.04). Similarly, the forwardretraction movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P=0.28). Conclusion: The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the SPS has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.

AB - Purpose: To compare the accuracy and precision of a conventional intraocular syringe to the Suh precision syringe (SPS), a new injection device designed to decrease operator error and to reduce adverse outcomes by providing a more ergonomic technique for periocular and intraocular injections. Methods: Participants were instructed to inject a specified quantity of water into a 0.2 mL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube and a sheep eye, first with the conventional syringe, and then with the SPS. The degree of needle movement during injection was video recorded and analyzed for forward-retraction movement and variability in movement. The volume of water injected into the PCR tube was also documented. Data was analyzed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: As compared to the conventional syringe, the SPS had significantly less forwardretraction movement when injecting into the sheep eye (P=0.04). Similarly, the forwardretraction movement of the needle when injecting into the PCR tube was less while using the SPS compared with the conventional syringe; however, this was not statistically significant (P=0.09). There was no significant difference in the volume of water expelled from both syringes (P=0.28). Conclusion: The SPS demonstrates significant potential to decrease the overall risk involved with injections through reduction of forward-retraction movement during device operation. This new syringe design also provides better control with injection depth and drug injection volume. With its more ergonomic design, the SPS has the potential to decrease risks associated with intraocular injections by improving the accuracy and precision of the injection.

KW - Intraocular injection

KW - Suh precision syringe

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073276113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073276113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2147/OPTH.S211485

DO - 10.2147/OPTH.S211485

M3 - Article

C2 - 31571822

AN - SCOPUS:85073276113

VL - 13

SP - 1833

EP - 1839

JO - Clinical Ophthalmology

JF - Clinical Ophthalmology

SN - 1177-5467

ER -