A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods

Jamie M. Zoellner, Wen You, Jennie L. Hill, Donna Jean P. Brock, Maryam Yuhas, Ramine C. Alexander, Bryan Price, Paul A. Estabrooks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

While there is a large body of literature documenting the efficacy of family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions, there is little evidence that these interventions have been systematically translated into regular practice — particularly in health disparate regions. To address this research-practice gap, this project was guided by a community advisory board (CAB) and the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework within a systems-based and community-based participatory research approach. Families with overweight or obese children between 5 and 12 years old, in the medically-underserved Dan River Region, were randomly assigned to one of two FBCO treatment programs (iChoose vs. Family Connections) delivered by local Parks & Recreation staff. Both programs have previously demonstrated clinically meaningful child BMI z-score reductions, but vary in intensity, structure, and implementation demands. Two clinical CAB partners embedded recruitment methods into their regional healthcare organization, using procedures representative to what could be used if either program was taken to scale. The primary effectiveness outcome is child BMI z-scores at 6-months, with additional assessments at 3-months and at 12-months. Secondary goals are to determine: (1) reach into the intended audience; (2) effectiveness on secondary child and parent outcomes; (3) intervention adoption by organizations and staff; (4) fidelity, cost, and capacity for intervention implementation; and (5) maintenance of individual-level changes and organizational-level sustainability. This research addresses literature gaps related to the features within clinical and community settings that could improve both child weight status and the translation of FBCO interventions into typical practice in medically-underserved communities. Identifiers: Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03245775.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number105801
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume84
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Pediatric Obesity
Community-Based Participatory Research
Organizations
Therapeutics
Organizational Innovation
Recreation
Research
Rivers
Maintenance
Delivery of Health Care
Weights and Measures
Costs and Cost Analysis
Health

Keywords

  • Behavioral intervention
  • Childhood obesity
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Comparative effectiveness research
  • Implementation science
  • Medically underserved area
  • Minority groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Cite this

A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region : Rationale, design & methods. / Zoellner, Jamie M.; You, Wen; Hill, Jennie L.; Brock, Donna Jean P.; Yuhas, Maryam; Alexander, Ramine C.; Price, Bryan; Estabrooks, Paul A.

In: Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 84, 105801, 09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc80ce4eb6654d0596a6b6a0ea746d3b,
title = "A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region: Rationale, design & methods",
abstract = "While there is a large body of literature documenting the efficacy of family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions, there is little evidence that these interventions have been systematically translated into regular practice — particularly in health disparate regions. To address this research-practice gap, this project was guided by a community advisory board (CAB) and the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework within a systems-based and community-based participatory research approach. Families with overweight or obese children between 5 and 12 years old, in the medically-underserved Dan River Region, were randomly assigned to one of two FBCO treatment programs (iChoose vs. Family Connections) delivered by local Parks & Recreation staff. Both programs have previously demonstrated clinically meaningful child BMI z-score reductions, but vary in intensity, structure, and implementation demands. Two clinical CAB partners embedded recruitment methods into their regional healthcare organization, using procedures representative to what could be used if either program was taken to scale. The primary effectiveness outcome is child BMI z-scores at 6-months, with additional assessments at 3-months and at 12-months. Secondary goals are to determine: (1) reach into the intended audience; (2) effectiveness on secondary child and parent outcomes; (3) intervention adoption by organizations and staff; (4) fidelity, cost, and capacity for intervention implementation; and (5) maintenance of individual-level changes and organizational-level sustainability. This research addresses literature gaps related to the features within clinical and community settings that could improve both child weight status and the translation of FBCO interventions into typical practice in medically-underserved communities. Identifiers: Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03245775.",
keywords = "Behavioral intervention, Childhood obesity, Community-based participatory research, Comparative effectiveness research, Implementation science, Medically underserved area, Minority groups",
author = "Zoellner, {Jamie M.} and Wen You and Hill, {Jennie L.} and Brock, {Donna Jean P.} and Maryam Yuhas and Alexander, {Ramine C.} and Bryan Price and Estabrooks, {Paul A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
journal = "Contemporary Clinical Trials",
issn = "1551-7144",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative effectiveness trial of two family-based childhood obesity treatment programs in a medically underserved region

T2 - Rationale, design & methods

AU - Zoellner, Jamie M.

AU - You, Wen

AU - Hill, Jennie L.

AU - Brock, Donna Jean P.

AU - Yuhas, Maryam

AU - Alexander, Ramine C.

AU - Price, Bryan

AU - Estabrooks, Paul A.

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - While there is a large body of literature documenting the efficacy of family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions, there is little evidence that these interventions have been systematically translated into regular practice — particularly in health disparate regions. To address this research-practice gap, this project was guided by a community advisory board (CAB) and the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework within a systems-based and community-based participatory research approach. Families with overweight or obese children between 5 and 12 years old, in the medically-underserved Dan River Region, were randomly assigned to one of two FBCO treatment programs (iChoose vs. Family Connections) delivered by local Parks & Recreation staff. Both programs have previously demonstrated clinically meaningful child BMI z-score reductions, but vary in intensity, structure, and implementation demands. Two clinical CAB partners embedded recruitment methods into their regional healthcare organization, using procedures representative to what could be used if either program was taken to scale. The primary effectiveness outcome is child BMI z-scores at 6-months, with additional assessments at 3-months and at 12-months. Secondary goals are to determine: (1) reach into the intended audience; (2) effectiveness on secondary child and parent outcomes; (3) intervention adoption by organizations and staff; (4) fidelity, cost, and capacity for intervention implementation; and (5) maintenance of individual-level changes and organizational-level sustainability. This research addresses literature gaps related to the features within clinical and community settings that could improve both child weight status and the translation of FBCO interventions into typical practice in medically-underserved communities. Identifiers: Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03245775.

AB - While there is a large body of literature documenting the efficacy of family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions, there is little evidence that these interventions have been systematically translated into regular practice — particularly in health disparate regions. To address this research-practice gap, this project was guided by a community advisory board (CAB) and the RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework within a systems-based and community-based participatory research approach. Families with overweight or obese children between 5 and 12 years old, in the medically-underserved Dan River Region, were randomly assigned to one of two FBCO treatment programs (iChoose vs. Family Connections) delivered by local Parks & Recreation staff. Both programs have previously demonstrated clinically meaningful child BMI z-score reductions, but vary in intensity, structure, and implementation demands. Two clinical CAB partners embedded recruitment methods into their regional healthcare organization, using procedures representative to what could be used if either program was taken to scale. The primary effectiveness outcome is child BMI z-scores at 6-months, with additional assessments at 3-months and at 12-months. Secondary goals are to determine: (1) reach into the intended audience; (2) effectiveness on secondary child and parent outcomes; (3) intervention adoption by organizations and staff; (4) fidelity, cost, and capacity for intervention implementation; and (5) maintenance of individual-level changes and organizational-level sustainability. This research addresses literature gaps related to the features within clinical and community settings that could improve both child weight status and the translation of FBCO interventions into typical practice in medically-underserved communities. Identifiers: Clincialtrials.gov: NCT03245775.

KW - Behavioral intervention

KW - Childhood obesity

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Comparative effectiveness research

KW - Implementation science

KW - Medically underserved area

KW - Minority groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069527441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069527441&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2019.06.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 31260792

AN - SCOPUS:85069527441

VL - 84

JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials

JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials

SN - 1551-7144

M1 - 105801

ER -