A cadence based sub-maximal field test for the prediction of peak oxygen consumption in elite wheelchair basketball athletes

James J. Laskin, Dustin R Slivka, Michael Frogley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Twenty-four elite wheelchair basketball athletes were recruited to assess the feasibility and concurrent validity of a cadence based sub-maximal field test. Sub-maximal trials consisted of two, five-minute workloads at 60 and 80 pushes per minute (pushes/min). The field test was performed by wheeling around an indoor basketball court to the beep of a metronome. Peak oxygen consumption, while arm cranking, was determined using an automated metabolic measurement system. Stepwise forward linear regression was used to develop prediction equations for peak VO2 (VO2 peak) for both cadences, resulting in the following equations; 60 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 0.74 + 0.31(classification) + 0.003(distance covered) - 0.15(RPE), r 2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.48 L/min; 80 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 1.50 + 0.0029(distance covered) - 0.16(RPE) + 0.235(classification), r 2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.45 L/min. There were no significant differences between the actual and the estimated VO2 peak values at either cadence. In addition the estimated VO2 peak from both cadence equations were linearly correlated (r = 0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed no cases where the difference between the actual and predicted VO2 peak was greater than two standard deviations beyond the mean of the differences, demonstrating good agreement. Due to the homogeneity of the sample, the test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficients) was moderate to poor for select variables; HR = 0.42, RPE = 0.63, distance covered = 0.50 and HR = 0.65, RPE = 0.70, distance covered = 0.62 for 60 and 80 pushes/min, respectively. The results of this preliminary study indicate that this sub-maximal field test is efficient, simple to perform, and predicts VO 2 peak in competitive wheelchair basketball athletes with similar accuracy to prediction equations designed for able-bodied individuals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)8-18
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Exercise Physiology Online
Volume7
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2004

Fingerprint

Basketball
Wheelchairs
Oxygen Consumption
Athletes
Workload
Reproducibility of Results
Linear Models

Keywords

  • Cardiorespiratory fitness test
  • Lower-limb disabled
  • Rating of perceived exertion
  • Wheelchair user

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology (medical)

Cite this

A cadence based sub-maximal field test for the prediction of peak oxygen consumption in elite wheelchair basketball athletes. / Laskin, James J.; Slivka, Dustin R; Frogley, Michael.

In: Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, Vol. 7, No. 1, 01.02.2004, p. 8-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d63313f2bfa4bacaadae41d6c028856,
title = "A cadence based sub-maximal field test for the prediction of peak oxygen consumption in elite wheelchair basketball athletes",
abstract = "Twenty-four elite wheelchair basketball athletes were recruited to assess the feasibility and concurrent validity of a cadence based sub-maximal field test. Sub-maximal trials consisted of two, five-minute workloads at 60 and 80 pushes per minute (pushes/min). The field test was performed by wheeling around an indoor basketball court to the beep of a metronome. Peak oxygen consumption, while arm cranking, was determined using an automated metabolic measurement system. Stepwise forward linear regression was used to develop prediction equations for peak VO2 (VO2 peak) for both cadences, resulting in the following equations; 60 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 0.74 + 0.31(classification) + 0.003(distance covered) - 0.15(RPE), r 2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.48 L/min; 80 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 1.50 + 0.0029(distance covered) - 0.16(RPE) + 0.235(classification), r 2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.45 L/min. There were no significant differences between the actual and the estimated VO2 peak values at either cadence. In addition the estimated VO2 peak from both cadence equations were linearly correlated (r = 0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed no cases where the difference between the actual and predicted VO2 peak was greater than two standard deviations beyond the mean of the differences, demonstrating good agreement. Due to the homogeneity of the sample, the test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficients) was moderate to poor for select variables; HR = 0.42, RPE = 0.63, distance covered = 0.50 and HR = 0.65, RPE = 0.70, distance covered = 0.62 for 60 and 80 pushes/min, respectively. The results of this preliminary study indicate that this sub-maximal field test is efficient, simple to perform, and predicts VO 2 peak in competitive wheelchair basketball athletes with similar accuracy to prediction equations designed for able-bodied individuals.",
keywords = "Cardiorespiratory fitness test, Lower-limb disabled, Rating of perceived exertion, Wheelchair user",
author = "Laskin, {James J.} and Slivka, {Dustin R} and Michael Frogley",
year = "2004",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "8--18",
journal = "Journal of Exercise Physiology Online",
issn = "1097-9751",
publisher = "American Society of Exercise Physiologists",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cadence based sub-maximal field test for the prediction of peak oxygen consumption in elite wheelchair basketball athletes

AU - Laskin, James J.

AU - Slivka, Dustin R

AU - Frogley, Michael

PY - 2004/2/1

Y1 - 2004/2/1

N2 - Twenty-four elite wheelchair basketball athletes were recruited to assess the feasibility and concurrent validity of a cadence based sub-maximal field test. Sub-maximal trials consisted of two, five-minute workloads at 60 and 80 pushes per minute (pushes/min). The field test was performed by wheeling around an indoor basketball court to the beep of a metronome. Peak oxygen consumption, while arm cranking, was determined using an automated metabolic measurement system. Stepwise forward linear regression was used to develop prediction equations for peak VO2 (VO2 peak) for both cadences, resulting in the following equations; 60 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 0.74 + 0.31(classification) + 0.003(distance covered) - 0.15(RPE), r 2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.48 L/min; 80 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 1.50 + 0.0029(distance covered) - 0.16(RPE) + 0.235(classification), r 2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.45 L/min. There were no significant differences between the actual and the estimated VO2 peak values at either cadence. In addition the estimated VO2 peak from both cadence equations were linearly correlated (r = 0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed no cases where the difference between the actual and predicted VO2 peak was greater than two standard deviations beyond the mean of the differences, demonstrating good agreement. Due to the homogeneity of the sample, the test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficients) was moderate to poor for select variables; HR = 0.42, RPE = 0.63, distance covered = 0.50 and HR = 0.65, RPE = 0.70, distance covered = 0.62 for 60 and 80 pushes/min, respectively. The results of this preliminary study indicate that this sub-maximal field test is efficient, simple to perform, and predicts VO 2 peak in competitive wheelchair basketball athletes with similar accuracy to prediction equations designed for able-bodied individuals.

AB - Twenty-four elite wheelchair basketball athletes were recruited to assess the feasibility and concurrent validity of a cadence based sub-maximal field test. Sub-maximal trials consisted of two, five-minute workloads at 60 and 80 pushes per minute (pushes/min). The field test was performed by wheeling around an indoor basketball court to the beep of a metronome. Peak oxygen consumption, while arm cranking, was determined using an automated metabolic measurement system. Stepwise forward linear regression was used to develop prediction equations for peak VO2 (VO2 peak) for both cadences, resulting in the following equations; 60 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 0.74 + 0.31(classification) + 0.003(distance covered) - 0.15(RPE), r 2 = 0.73, SEE = 0.48 L/min; 80 pushes/min VO2 peak (L/min) = 1.50 + 0.0029(distance covered) - 0.16(RPE) + 0.235(classification), r 2 = 0.74, SEE = 0.45 L/min. There were no significant differences between the actual and the estimated VO2 peak values at either cadence. In addition the estimated VO2 peak from both cadence equations were linearly correlated (r = 0.87). Bland-Altman plots revealed no cases where the difference between the actual and predicted VO2 peak was greater than two standard deviations beyond the mean of the differences, demonstrating good agreement. Due to the homogeneity of the sample, the test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficients) was moderate to poor for select variables; HR = 0.42, RPE = 0.63, distance covered = 0.50 and HR = 0.65, RPE = 0.70, distance covered = 0.62 for 60 and 80 pushes/min, respectively. The results of this preliminary study indicate that this sub-maximal field test is efficient, simple to perform, and predicts VO 2 peak in competitive wheelchair basketball athletes with similar accuracy to prediction equations designed for able-bodied individuals.

KW - Cardiorespiratory fitness test

KW - Lower-limb disabled

KW - Rating of perceived exertion

KW - Wheelchair user

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18944366644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18944366644&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 8

EP - 18

JO - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

JF - Journal of Exercise Physiology Online

SN - 1097-9751

IS - 1

ER -